Comparing the effect of isotopically labeled or structural analog internal standards on the performance of a LC-MS/MS method to determine ciclosporin A, everolimus, sirolimus and tacrolimus in whole blood
Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is routinely used for analysis of immunosuppressive drugs. This study investigated whether replacing analog internal standards (ANISs) with isotopically labeled internal standards (ILISs) has an impact on the performance of a LC-MS/MS method...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 2016-03, Vol.54 (3), p.437-446 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is routinely used for analysis of immunosuppressive drugs. This study investigated whether replacing analog internal standards (ANISs) with isotopically labeled internal standards (ILISs) has an impact on the performance of a LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of tacrolimus (TAC), sirolimus (SIR), ciclosporin A (CsA) and everolimus (EVE) in whole blood.
Following hemolysis, protein precipitation, and extraction with either ANISs (ascomycin, desmethoxy-rapamycin, CsD), or ILISs (TAC-
C,D
; SIR-
C,D
; CsA-D
; EVE-D
), samples were centrifuged and injected into a LC-MS/MS device equipped with a C18 reversed phase column. The effect of the two ISs on the linearity, precision, accuracy, trueness, matrix effects, and carryover was investigated by using the same patient-, proficiency testing-, and quality control samples. Statistical analysis of agreement between results includes a standard random effects model and Passing-Bablok regression.
Within-day imprecision was |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1434-6621 1437-4331 |
DOI: | 10.1515/cclm-2015-0519 |