A systematic review of the cost and cost effectiveness of using standard oral nutritional supplements in community and care home settings
Summary Background & aims Despite the clinical benefits of using standard (non-disease specific) oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in the community and care homes, there is uncertainty about their economic consequences. Methods A systematic review was undertaken according to recommended procedu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) Scotland), 2016-02, Vol.35 (1), p.125-137 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary Background & aims Despite the clinical benefits of using standard (non-disease specific) oral nutritional supplements (ONS) in the community and care homes, there is uncertainty about their economic consequences. Methods A systematic review was undertaken according to recommended procedures to assess whether ONS can produce cost savings and cost-effective outcomes. Results 19 publications with and without a hospital component were identified: 9 full text papers, 9 abstracts, and 1 report with retrospective analyses of 6 randomised controlled trials. From these publications a total of 31 cost and 4 cost-effectiveness analyses were identified. Most were retrospective analyses based on clinical data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In 9 studies/economic models involving ONS use for |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0261-5614 1532-1983 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.07.012 |