Motor Improvement and Emotional Stabilization in Patients With Tourette Syndrome After Deep Brain Stimulation of the Ventral Anterior and Ventrolateral Motor Part of the Thalamus

Abstract Background Since its first application in 1999, the potential benefit of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in reducing symptoms of otherwise treatment-refractory Tourette syndrome (TS) has been documented in several publications. However, uncertainty regarding the ideal neural targets remains, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological psychiatry (1969) 2016-03, Vol.79 (5), p.392-401
Hauptverfasser: Huys, Daniel, Bartsch, Christina, Koester, Philip, Lenartz, Doris, Maarouf, Mohammad, Daumann, Jörg, Mai, Jürgen K, Klosterkötter, Joachim, Hunsche, Stefan, Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle, Woopen, Christiane, Timmermann, Lars, Sturm, Volker, Kuhn, Jens
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Since its first application in 1999, the potential benefit of deep brain stimulation (DBS) in reducing symptoms of otherwise treatment-refractory Tourette syndrome (TS) has been documented in several publications. However, uncertainty regarding the ideal neural targets remains, and the eventuality of so far undocumented but possible negative long-term effects on personality fuels the debate about the ethical implications of DBS. Methods In this prospective open-label trial, eight patients (three female, five male) 19–56 years old with severe and medically intractable TS were treated with high-frequency DBS of the ventral anterior and ventrolateral motor part of the thalamus. To assess the course of TS, its clinical comorbidities, personality parameters, and self-perceived quality of life, patients underwent repeated psychiatric assessments at baseline and 6 and 12 months after DBS onset. Results Analysis indicated a strongly significant and beneficial effect of DBS on TS symptoms, trait anxiety, quality of life, and global functioning with an apparently low side-effect profile. In addition, presurgical compulsivity, anxiety, emotional dysregulation, and inhibition appeared to be significant predictors of surgery outcome. Conclusions Trading off motor effects and desirable side effects against surgery-related risks and negative implications, stimulation of the ventral anterior and ventrolateral motor part of the thalamus seems to be a valuable option when considering DBS for TS.
ISSN:0006-3223
1873-2402
DOI:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.05.014