Cystic fibrosis carrier screening effects on birth prevalence and newborn screening
Purpose: We evaluated the effects of cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening on birth prevalence trends and newborn screening (NBS) efficiency by comparing two Italian regions; carrier screening was performed in one region (eastern region (ER)) and not in the other (western region (WR)). Methods: Ann...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Genetics in medicine 2016-02, Vol.18 (2), p.145-151 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose:
We evaluated the effects of cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier screening on birth prevalence trends and newborn screening (NBS) efficiency by comparing two Italian regions; carrier screening was performed in one region (eastern region (ER)) and not in the other (western region (WR)).
Methods:
Annual births of infants with CF, NBS false-positive results, NBS uncertain diagnoses (borderline sweat chloride (BSC)), carrier tests performed, and carriers detected were monitored during the 1993–2013 period.
Measurements and main results:
A total of 259 newborns with CF were detected. In the ER, 150 carrier couples were found. Mean annual percentage of birth prevalence decrease was 9% per 10,000 (
P
= 0.002) and was greater in the ER (15%,
P
= 0.0008; WR 1%,
P
= ns). The WR estimated birth prevalence was 1/3,589 in 1993 and 1/3,870 in 2013; in the ER it was 1/2,730 in 1993 and 1/14,200 in 2013. The ER birth prevalence correlated inversely with the number of carrier couples (
P
= 0.0032). The ratio between CF cases and NBS-positive results significantly decreased in the ER (1.6%,
P
= 0.0001) but not in the WR. The ratio between prevalence of BSC and of CF cases increased in the ER (
P
= 0.008) but not in the WR (
P
= 0.1).
Conclusion:
Carrier screening was connected with a decrease in birth prevalence of CF. Poorer NBS performance was observed in the carrier screening area.
Genet Med
18
2, 145–151. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1098-3600 1530-0366 |
DOI: | 10.1038/gim.2015.68 |