Simulation analysis of optimized brachytherapy for uterine cervical cancer: Can we select the best brachytherapy modality depending on tumor size?

Abstract Purpose To choose the optimal brachytherapeutic modality for uterine cervical cancer, we performed simulation analysis. Methods and Materials For each high-risk clinical target volume (HR CTV), we compared four modalities [classical conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (Conv ICBT), Imag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brachytherapy 2016, Vol.15 (1), p.57-64
Hauptverfasser: Yoshida, Ken, Yamazaki, Hideya, Kotsuma, Tadayuki, Takenaka, Tadashi, Ueda, Mari Mikami, Miyake, Shunsuke, Tsujimoto, Yutaka, Masui, Koji, Yoshioka, Yasuo, Sumida, Iori, Uesugi, Yasuo, Shimbo, Taiju, Yoshikawa, Nobuhiko, Yoshioka, Hiroto, Tanaka, Eiichi, Narumi, Yoshifumi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Purpose To choose the optimal brachytherapeutic modality for uterine cervical cancer, we performed simulation analysis. Methods and Materials For each high-risk clinical target volume (HR CTV), we compared four modalities [classical conventional intracavitary brachytherapy (Conv ICBT), Image-guided ICBT (IGICBT), intracavitary/interstitial brachytherapy (ICISBT), and interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) with perineal approach] using dose-volume histograms using eight sizes of HR CTV (2 × 2 × 2 cm to 7 × 4 × 4 cm) and organs at risk model. Results InConv ICBT, the doses covered 90% of the HR CTV [ D90 (HR CTV)] decreased from 197% prescribed dose (PD) for the HR CTV size (2 × 2 × 2 cm) to 73% PD for 5 × 4 × 4 cm, whereas the other three modalities could achieve 100% PD for all HR CTV sizes. The minimum doses received by the maximally irradiated 2-cm3 volumes for organs at risks of IGICBT demonstrated lower values than those ofConv ICBT for the HR CTV size of 4 × 3 × 3 cm or smaller. ICISBT demonstrated lower values than those of IGICBT for 4 × 3 × 3 cm or larger. ISBT demonstrated lowest values for 5 × 4 × 4 cm or larger. Conclusions HR CTV size of 4 × 3 × 3 cm seems to be a threshold volume in this simulation analysis, and IGICBT is a better choice for smaller HR CTV than the threshold volume. On larger HR CTV, ICISBT or ISBT is the better choice.
ISSN:1538-4721
1873-1449
DOI:10.1016/j.brachy.2015.10.002