Glycaemic control is a predictor of infection-related hospitalization on haemodialysis patients: Miyazaki Dialysis Cohort study (MID study)
Aim Although infection is the second leading cause of death in maintenance haemodialysis patients, the effects of glycaemic control on infection in diabetic haemodialysis patients have not yet been examined in detail. We examined the relationship between diabetes or glycemic control and infection‐re...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) Vic.), 2016-03, Vol.21 (3), p.236-240 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Aim
Although infection is the second leading cause of death in maintenance haemodialysis patients, the effects of glycaemic control on infection in diabetic haemodialysis patients have not yet been examined in detail. We examined the relationship between diabetes or glycemic control and infection‐related hospitalization (IRH) in haemodialysis patients.
Methods
Patients receiving maintenance haemodialysis (n = 1551, 493 diabetic patients) were enrolled in this prospective cohort study in December 2009 and followed‐up for 3 years. IRH during the follow‐up period was ed from medical records. Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to investigate the relationship between diabetes or glycaemic control and IRH.
Results
The Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that the risk of IRH was significantly higher in haemodialysis patients with diabetes, particularly in those with poorly controlled HbA1c levels (HbA1c ≥ 7.0%), than in haemodialysis patients without diabetes. When patients with ≥HbA1c 7.0% were divided into two groups using a median value of HbA1c, the risk of IRH was significantly higher in those with the poorest glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7.4%), an older age, or lower albumin levels. The multivariable‐adjusted hazard ratio for the risk of IRH was not higher in the second criteria of HbA1c (HbA1c 7.0–7.3%), but was significantly higher in the group with the poorest glycaemic control (HbA1c ≥ 7.4%) than in those in the good control criterion (HbA1c |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1320-5358 1440-1797 |
DOI: | 10.1111/nep.12587 |