Prognostic Value of Cardiac Sympathetic Nerve Imaging Using Long-Term Follow-up Data – Ischemic vs. Non-Ischemic Heart Failure Etiology
Background:Although there are several known prognostic determinants in heart failure (HF), individual risk profiles can vary, in particular between ischemic and non-ischemic HF background. This study investigated the difference in prognostic efficacy of cardiac 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Circulation Journal 2016/01/25, Vol.80(2), pp.435-441 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:Although there are several known prognostic determinants in heart failure (HF), individual risk profiles can vary, in particular between ischemic and non-ischemic HF background. This study investigated the difference in prognostic efficacy of cardiac 123I-meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging between the 2 etiologies.Methods and Results:All 1,322 patients with HF were enrolled and followed up at most after 10 years. The HF patients were divided into 2 groups: an ischemic group (n=362) and non-ischemic group (n=960), and Cox proportional hazards model was used for data analysis. During 10 years of follow-up, 296 (22.4%) of 1,322 patients died; the mortality rates were 21.8% and 22.6% for the ischemic and non-ischemic groups, respectively. The ischemic group had greater prevalence of sudden death and lethal acute myocardial infarction, and the non-ischemic group had a higher rate of pump failure death. On multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis using categorized variables, in the ischemic group, delayed heart-to-mediastinum ratio (HMR; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1346-9843 1347-4820 |
DOI: | 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0952 |