Random blinded rechecking of AFB smears in a pilot project at an intermediate reference laboratory

BACKGROUND: In most developing countries, sputum smear microscopy for acid-fast bacilli remains the front line and often the only diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB), making quality assurance of smear microscopy an important activity.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of a pilot s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease 2016-02, Vol.20 (2), p.252-256
Hauptverfasser: Sidiq, Z., Hanif, M., Chopra, K. K., Khanna, A., Ahmad, V., Vashistha, H., Saini, S., Dubey, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 256
container_issue 2
container_start_page 252
container_title The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease
container_volume 20
creator Sidiq, Z.
Hanif, M.
Chopra, K. K.
Khanna, A.
Ahmad, V.
Vashistha, H.
Saini, S.
Dubey, M.
description BACKGROUND: In most developing countries, sputum smear microscopy for acid-fast bacilli remains the front line and often the only diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB), making quality assurance of smear microscopy an important activity.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of a pilot study, where the random blinded rechecking for the entire state of Delhi was conducted at a reference laboratory.METHODOLOGY: Slides from 25 Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme designated districts (200 peripheral microscopy centres) in Delhi were re-read after proper coding by all the Senior Tuberculosis Laboratory Supervisors (STLS) at an intermediate reference laboratory under proper supervision.RESULTS: Of 12 162 re-read slides, 204 discrepant results were found. Of these, 150 (73.5%) errors were attributed to the peripheral microscopy centres and 54 (26.5%) to STLS. High false-positive errors were observed at a frequency of 12/150 (8%), and high false-negative errors at a frequency of 38/150 (25%). Minor errors, i.e., low false-negative, low false-positive and quantification errors, were observed at frequencies of respectively 68/150 (45.3%), 17/150 (11.3%) and 15/150 (10.0%).CONCLUSION: Greater stringency in the supervision of random blinded rechecking at the district level is essential to make smear rechecking more efficient and effective.
doi_str_mv 10.5588/ijtld.15.0481
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_ingen</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760917193</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>iuatld/ijtld/2016/00000020/00000002/art00021</ingid><sourcerecordid>1760917193</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-ac4eebdb88c52d169b45cea0d0a9be85eea28e3050a5adf8e5142b22e88fb5973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhiMEoh9w5Ip85JJl7MQb51haSpEqIRCcrbE9KV6yzmI7SOXX42wWbliWZiQ_fmfmnap6xWEjpVJv_S6PbsPlBlrFn1TnXHFZd72ApyUH0dVNx_uz6iKlHYDgnHfPqzOxLUSr4LwyXzC4ac_M6IMjxyLZ72R_-PDApoFd3b5jaU8YE_OBITv4ccrsEKcd2cyw3FAeMsU9OY-ZyveBIgVLbEQzRcxTfHxRPRtwTPTyFC-rb7fvv17f1fefPny8vrqvbSNVrtG2RMYZpawUjm9700pLCA6wN6QkEQpFDUhAiW5QJHkrjBCk1GBk3zWX1ZtVt_T3c6aU9d4nS-OIgaY5ad5toefFjaag9YraOKVUmtaH6PcYHzUHvdiqj7ZqLvVia-Ffn6RnU0b9R__1sQCfV6AYRyGj3k1zDGVa7a32Mx7FyjaWZehfAoLQomwDlJClCDTa0YDzmHXGqB9-6ySWojf_01wF1x4F8K2G4xFwSkBojHmJvPkDpVKmZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760917193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Random blinded rechecking of AFB smears in a pilot project at an intermediate reference laboratory</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sidiq, Z. ; Hanif, M. ; Chopra, K. K. ; Khanna, A. ; Ahmad, V. ; Vashistha, H. ; Saini, S. ; Dubey, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sidiq, Z. ; Hanif, M. ; Chopra, K. K. ; Khanna, A. ; Ahmad, V. ; Vashistha, H. ; Saini, S. ; Dubey, M.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: In most developing countries, sputum smear microscopy for acid-fast bacilli remains the front line and often the only diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB), making quality assurance of smear microscopy an important activity.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of a pilot study, where the random blinded rechecking for the entire state of Delhi was conducted at a reference laboratory.METHODOLOGY: Slides from 25 Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme designated districts (200 peripheral microscopy centres) in Delhi were re-read after proper coding by all the Senior Tuberculosis Laboratory Supervisors (STLS) at an intermediate reference laboratory under proper supervision.RESULTS: Of 12 162 re-read slides, 204 discrepant results were found. Of these, 150 (73.5%) errors were attributed to the peripheral microscopy centres and 54 (26.5%) to STLS. High false-positive errors were observed at a frequency of 12/150 (8%), and high false-negative errors at a frequency of 38/150 (25%). Minor errors, i.e., low false-negative, low false-positive and quantification errors, were observed at frequencies of respectively 68/150 (45.3%), 17/150 (11.3%) and 15/150 (10.0%).CONCLUSION: Greater stringency in the supervision of random blinded rechecking at the district level is essential to make smear rechecking more efficient and effective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1027-3719</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1815-7920</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.15.0481</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26792480</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>France: International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease</publisher><subject>Afb Microscopy ; Bacteriological Techniques - standards ; Developing Countries ; Diagnostic Errors - prevention &amp; control ; External Quality Assurance ; False Negative Reactions ; False Positive Reactions ; Humans ; India ; Laboratory Proficiency Testing ; Microscopy - standards ; Mycobacterium tuberculosis - isolation &amp; purification ; Observer Variation ; Pilot Projects ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Program Evaluation ; Random Blinded Rechecking ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sputum - microbiology ; Staining and Labeling - standards ; Tuberculosis ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis ; Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - microbiology</subject><ispartof>The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease, 2016-02, Vol.20 (2), p.252-256</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-ac4eebdb88c52d169b45cea0d0a9be85eea28e3050a5adf8e5142b22e88fb5973</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26792480$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sidiq, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanif, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chopra, K. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanna, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vashistha, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saini, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubey, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Random blinded rechecking of AFB smears in a pilot project at an intermediate reference laboratory</title><title>The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease</title><addtitle>Int J Tuberc Lung Dis</addtitle><description>BACKGROUND: In most developing countries, sputum smear microscopy for acid-fast bacilli remains the front line and often the only diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB), making quality assurance of smear microscopy an important activity.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of a pilot study, where the random blinded rechecking for the entire state of Delhi was conducted at a reference laboratory.METHODOLOGY: Slides from 25 Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme designated districts (200 peripheral microscopy centres) in Delhi were re-read after proper coding by all the Senior Tuberculosis Laboratory Supervisors (STLS) at an intermediate reference laboratory under proper supervision.RESULTS: Of 12 162 re-read slides, 204 discrepant results were found. Of these, 150 (73.5%) errors were attributed to the peripheral microscopy centres and 54 (26.5%) to STLS. High false-positive errors were observed at a frequency of 12/150 (8%), and high false-negative errors at a frequency of 38/150 (25%). Minor errors, i.e., low false-negative, low false-positive and quantification errors, were observed at frequencies of respectively 68/150 (45.3%), 17/150 (11.3%) and 15/150 (10.0%).CONCLUSION: Greater stringency in the supervision of random blinded rechecking at the district level is essential to make smear rechecking more efficient and effective.</description><subject>Afb Microscopy</subject><subject>Bacteriological Techniques - standards</subject><subject>Developing Countries</subject><subject>Diagnostic Errors - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>External Quality Assurance</subject><subject>False Negative Reactions</subject><subject>False Positive Reactions</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Laboratory Proficiency Testing</subject><subject>Microscopy - standards</subject><subject>Mycobacterium tuberculosis - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Random Blinded Rechecking</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sputum - microbiology</subject><subject>Staining and Labeling - standards</subject><subject>Tuberculosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis</subject><subject>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - microbiology</subject><issn>1027-3719</issn><issn>1815-7920</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU1v1DAQhiMEoh9w5Ip85JJl7MQb51haSpEqIRCcrbE9KV6yzmI7SOXX42wWbliWZiQ_fmfmnap6xWEjpVJv_S6PbsPlBlrFn1TnXHFZd72ApyUH0dVNx_uz6iKlHYDgnHfPqzOxLUSr4LwyXzC4ac_M6IMjxyLZ72R_-PDApoFd3b5jaU8YE_OBITv4ccrsEKcd2cyw3FAeMsU9OY-ZyveBIgVLbEQzRcxTfHxRPRtwTPTyFC-rb7fvv17f1fefPny8vrqvbSNVrtG2RMYZpawUjm9700pLCA6wN6QkEQpFDUhAiW5QJHkrjBCk1GBk3zWX1ZtVt_T3c6aU9d4nS-OIgaY5ad5toefFjaag9YraOKVUmtaH6PcYHzUHvdiqj7ZqLvVia-Ffn6RnU0b9R__1sQCfV6AYRyGj3k1zDGVa7a32Mx7FyjaWZehfAoLQomwDlJClCDTa0YDzmHXGqB9-6ySWojf_01wF1x4F8K2G4xFwSkBojHmJvPkDpVKmZA</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Sidiq, Z.</creator><creator>Hanif, M.</creator><creator>Chopra, K. K.</creator><creator>Khanna, A.</creator><creator>Ahmad, V.</creator><creator>Vashistha, H.</creator><creator>Saini, S.</creator><creator>Dubey, M.</creator><general>International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Random blinded rechecking of AFB smears in a pilot project at an intermediate reference laboratory</title><author>Sidiq, Z. ; Hanif, M. ; Chopra, K. K. ; Khanna, A. ; Ahmad, V. ; Vashistha, H. ; Saini, S. ; Dubey, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-ac4eebdb88c52d169b45cea0d0a9be85eea28e3050a5adf8e5142b22e88fb5973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Afb Microscopy</topic><topic>Bacteriological Techniques - standards</topic><topic>Developing Countries</topic><topic>Diagnostic Errors - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>External Quality Assurance</topic><topic>False Negative Reactions</topic><topic>False Positive Reactions</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Laboratory Proficiency Testing</topic><topic>Microscopy - standards</topic><topic>Mycobacterium tuberculosis - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Random Blinded Rechecking</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sputum - microbiology</topic><topic>Staining and Labeling - standards</topic><topic>Tuberculosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis</topic><topic>Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - microbiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sidiq, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanif, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chopra, K. K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khanna, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vashistha, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saini, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dubey, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sidiq, Z.</au><au>Hanif, M.</au><au>Chopra, K. K.</au><au>Khanna, A.</au><au>Ahmad, V.</au><au>Vashistha, H.</au><au>Saini, S.</au><au>Dubey, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Random blinded rechecking of AFB smears in a pilot project at an intermediate reference laboratory</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Tuberc Lung Dis</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>252</spage><epage>256</epage><pages>252-256</pages><issn>1027-3719</issn><eissn>1815-7920</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND: In most developing countries, sputum smear microscopy for acid-fast bacilli remains the front line and often the only diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB), making quality assurance of smear microscopy an important activity.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of a pilot study, where the random blinded rechecking for the entire state of Delhi was conducted at a reference laboratory.METHODOLOGY: Slides from 25 Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme designated districts (200 peripheral microscopy centres) in Delhi were re-read after proper coding by all the Senior Tuberculosis Laboratory Supervisors (STLS) at an intermediate reference laboratory under proper supervision.RESULTS: Of 12 162 re-read slides, 204 discrepant results were found. Of these, 150 (73.5%) errors were attributed to the peripheral microscopy centres and 54 (26.5%) to STLS. High false-positive errors were observed at a frequency of 12/150 (8%), and high false-negative errors at a frequency of 38/150 (25%). Minor errors, i.e., low false-negative, low false-positive and quantification errors, were observed at frequencies of respectively 68/150 (45.3%), 17/150 (11.3%) and 15/150 (10.0%).CONCLUSION: Greater stringency in the supervision of random blinded rechecking at the district level is essential to make smear rechecking more efficient and effective.</abstract><cop>France</cop><pub>International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease</pub><pmid>26792480</pmid><doi>10.5588/ijtld.15.0481</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1027-3719
ispartof The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease, 2016-02, Vol.20 (2), p.252-256
issn 1027-3719
1815-7920
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1760917193
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Afb Microscopy
Bacteriological Techniques - standards
Developing Countries
Diagnostic Errors - prevention & control
External Quality Assurance
False Negative Reactions
False Positive Reactions
Humans
India
Laboratory Proficiency Testing
Microscopy - standards
Mycobacterium tuberculosis - isolation & purification
Observer Variation
Pilot Projects
Predictive Value of Tests
Program Evaluation
Random Blinded Rechecking
Reproducibility of Results
Sputum - microbiology
Staining and Labeling - standards
Tuberculosis
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - diagnosis
Tuberculosis, Pulmonary - microbiology
title Random blinded rechecking of AFB smears in a pilot project at an intermediate reference laboratory
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T12%3A13%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_ingen&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Random%20blinded%20rechecking%20of%20AFB%20smears%20in%20a%20pilot%20project%20at%20an%20intermediate%20reference%20laboratory&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20tuberculosis%20and%20lung%20disease&rft.au=Sidiq,%20Z.&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=252&rft.epage=256&rft.pages=252-256&rft.issn=1027-3719&rft.eissn=1815-7920&rft_id=info:doi/10.5588/ijtld.15.0481&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_ingen%3E1760917193%3C/proquest_ingen%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760917193&rft_id=info:pmid/26792480&rft_ingid=iuatld/ijtld/2016/00000020/00000002/art00021&rfr_iscdi=true