Random blinded rechecking of AFB smears in a pilot project at an intermediate reference laboratory
BACKGROUND: In most developing countries, sputum smear microscopy for acid-fast bacilli remains the front line and often the only diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB), making quality assurance of smear microscopy an important activity.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of a pilot s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease 2016-02, Vol.20 (2), p.252-256 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND: In most developing countries, sputum smear microscopy for acid-fast bacilli remains the front line and often the only diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB), making quality assurance of smear microscopy an important activity.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the
results of a pilot study, where the random blinded rechecking for the entire state of Delhi was conducted at a reference laboratory.METHODOLOGY: Slides from 25 Revised National Tuberculosis Control Programme designated districts (200 peripheral microscopy centres) in Delhi were re-read
after proper coding by all the Senior Tuberculosis Laboratory Supervisors (STLS) at an intermediate reference laboratory under proper supervision.RESULTS: Of 12 162 re-read slides, 204 discrepant results were found. Of these, 150 (73.5%) errors were attributed to the peripheral
microscopy centres and 54 (26.5%) to STLS. High false-positive errors were observed at a frequency of 12/150 (8%), and high false-negative errors at a frequency of 38/150 (25%). Minor errors, i.e., low false-negative, low false-positive and quantification errors, were observed at frequencies
of respectively 68/150 (45.3%), 17/150 (11.3%) and 15/150 (10.0%).CONCLUSION: Greater stringency in the supervision of random blinded rechecking at the district level is essential to make smear rechecking more efficient and effective. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1027-3719 1815-7920 |
DOI: | 10.5588/ijtld.15.0481 |