Assessment of endothelin and copeptin as biomarkers for vasovagal syncope
Background The diagnosis of vasovagal syncope continues to be difficult despite the use of accurate histories, tilt testing and implantable loop recorders. A circulating biomarker might be useful to facilitate diagnoses. Both endothelin‐1 and vasopressin are increased during positive tilt tests resu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of clinical investigation 2016-02, Vol.46 (2), p.141-145 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The diagnosis of vasovagal syncope continues to be difficult despite the use of accurate histories, tilt testing and implantable loop recorders. A circulating biomarker might be useful to facilitate diagnoses. Both endothelin‐1 and vasopressin are increased during positive tilt tests resulting in syncope. Copeptin is a stable cleavage product of vasopressin formation. We conducted a pilot study to assess the utility of endothelin‐1 and copeptin as circulating biomarkers of vasovagal syncope.
Methods
Three populations were studied: syncope patients, epilepsy patients and controls. Vasovagal syncope diagnosis was ascertained with the Calgary Syncope Score and epilepsy diagnosis was confirmed with EEG. Plasma levels of endothelin‐1 were measured using by ELISA and copeptin levels were determined using an EIA kit.
Results
Asymptomatic control subjects had mean age 35 ± 11 years (7/22 male); epileptic subjects had mean age 32 ± 7 years (4/15 male); and syncope subjects had mean age 33 ± 16 years (4 of 21 male). Circulating plasma levels of endothelin‐1 and copeptin were no different among the three groups. Mean concentrations of endothelin‐1 were as follows: syncope, 23 ± 32 pg/mL; controls, 21 ± 17 pg/mL; and epileptics, 18 ± 12 pg/mL. Mean concentrations of copeptin were as follows: syncope, 1·29 ± 0·79 ng/mL; controls, 1·25 ± 0·79 ng/mL; and seizures, 1·23 ± 0·45 ng/mL. There were no significant correlations between syncope frequency and copeptin or endothelin‐1 levels.
Conclusion
Circulating plasma endothelin‐1 and copeptin levels are not significantly different among populations of controls, syncope patients and seizure patients. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0014-2972 1365-2362 |
DOI: | 10.1111/eci.12576 |