Reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of vulvar naevi: six cases
Background and objectives The differential diagnosis between vulvar naevi and melanoma is challenging. In vivo reflectance‐mode confocal microscopy (RCM) is an emerging technique that allows non‐invasive high‐resolution imaging of the skin and mucosa. It has recently been used for the study of vulva...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology 2016-01, Vol.30 (1), p.30-35 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background and objectives
The differential diagnosis between vulvar naevi and melanoma is challenging. In vivo reflectance‐mode confocal microscopy (RCM) is an emerging technique that allows non‐invasive high‐resolution imaging of the skin and mucosa. It has recently been used for the study of vulvar melanosis and melanoma, but it has not been so far employed for the diagnosis of genital naevi. The objective of this study is to evaluate RCM features of vulvar naevi and to compare them with dermoscopical and histopathological aspects.
Methods
Clinical, dermoscopical, in vivo RCM and histological features of six vulvar naevi were evaluated.
Results
The clinical and/or dermoscopical aspects were suspicious in all six cases. RCM showed a blue naevus, an atypical genital naevus, a junctional naevus and three compound naevi that were later confirmed by histological examination. In one compound naevus, RCM showed focal cytological atypia and architectural irregularity without clear features of malignancy, confirmed by histological examination.
Conclusions
Reflectance‐mode confocal microscopy can play a role in non‐invasive diagnosis of vulvar naevi, but further broader studies are required to validate our observations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0926-9959 1468-3083 |
DOI: | 10.1111/jdv.12924 |