Dose-response relationships in chemical carcinogenesis reflect differences in individual susceptibility. Consequences for cancer risk assessment, extrapolation, and prevention

The shape of the dose-cancer incidence curve observed in an animal bioassay for carcinogenicity of a chemical is the result of a superposition of various mechanisms contributing to the process of carcinogenesis. For genotoxic carcinogens, for instance, a sublinear (convex; up-bent) shape could be th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human & experimental toxicology 1999-12, Vol.18 (12), p.707-712
1. Verfasser: Lutz, W K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The shape of the dose-cancer incidence curve observed in an animal bioassay for carcinogenicity of a chemical is the result of a superposition of various mechanisms contributing to the process of carcinogenesis. For genotoxic carcinogens, for instance, a sublinear (convex; up-bent) shape could be the result of a saturation of DNA repair or of a higher rate of cell turnover associated with high-dose cytotoxicity and regenerative hyperplasia. In human cancer epidemiology, the situation is more complex. The human population is very heterogeneous with respect to both genetic and life-style factors that modulate the process of tumor formation. Therefore, individuals are expected to show widely variable susceptibility to carcinogenic factors, and the dose-response curve is in fact a reflection of the tolerance distribution. Each modulating factor divides the population up into sub populations of different susceptibility so that nonlinearities that could be present in a homogeneous population are flattened out. A linear extrapolation of a human cancer risk to low dose might therefore be appropriate under certain conditions even if the dose-response curve in animals has a strongly sigmoidal shape. For cancer prevention, the investigation of susceptibility factors is expected to be of great value. The elimination of concurrent risk factors in high-risk subpopulations or individuals might be more effective than a minor general reduction of a tolerable exposure level.
ISSN:0960-3271
1477-0903
DOI:10.1191/096032799678839653