Comparison of prognostic values between combined immunohistochemical score of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, Ki-67 and the corresponding gene expression score in breast cancer

In the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer, immunohistochemistry panels with estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and Ki-67 are routinely used, and they have been proposed for the classification of breast tumors into distinct subtypes....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Modern pathology 2013, Vol.26 (1), p.79-86
Hauptverfasser: Yamamoto-Ibusuki, Mutsuko, Yamamoto, Yutaka, Yamamoto, Satoko, Fujiwara, Saori, Fu, Peifen, Honda, Yumi, Iyama, Ken-ichi, Iwase, Hirotaka
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer, immunohistochemistry panels with estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and Ki-67 are routinely used, and they have been proposed for the classification of breast tumors into distinct subtypes. Gene expression analysis with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material have also become widely available recently, but the prognostic values of corresponding gene panels compared with these four immunohistochemical panels had never tested. We independently evaluated the 5-year relapse risk-estimation scores using semiquantitative data of four immunohistochemical panels (Ku-IHC4 score) and compared these with the results of four-gene expression profiling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens (Ku-FFPE4 score) in a consecutive series of 235 primary invasive breast cancer patients. Ku-IHC4 score was revealed to be an independent predictor of recurrence other than Ku-FFPE4 score in a multivariate model analyzed by classical clinical parameters (Ku-IHC4 score vs Ku-FFPE4 score; χ 2 : 14.2 vs 2.5, P : 0.0002 vs 0.11). When patients were trichotomized into high-, intermediate- and low-risk groups using the thresholds determined from the approximately calculated 5-year relapse rate, Kaplan–Meier analyses showed a significant difference among the three groups in Ku-IHC4 score (log-rank, P
ISSN:0893-3952
1530-0285
DOI:10.1038/modpathol.2012.151