Comparison of prognostic values between combined immunohistochemical score of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, Ki-67 and the corresponding gene expression score in breast cancer
In the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer, immunohistochemistry panels with estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and Ki-67 are routinely used, and they have been proposed for the classification of breast tumors into distinct subtypes....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Modern pathology 2013, Vol.26 (1), p.79-86 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In the clinical diagnosis of breast cancer, immunohistochemistry panels with estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PgR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and Ki-67 are routinely used, and they have been proposed for the classification of breast tumors into distinct subtypes. Gene expression analysis with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded material have also become widely available recently, but the prognostic values of corresponding gene panels compared with these four immunohistochemical panels had never tested. We independently evaluated the 5-year relapse risk-estimation scores using semiquantitative data of four immunohistochemical panels (Ku-IHC4 score) and compared these with the results of four-gene expression profiling of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens (Ku-FFPE4 score) in a consecutive series of 235 primary invasive breast cancer patients. Ku-IHC4 score was revealed to be an independent predictor of recurrence other than Ku-FFPE4 score in a multivariate model analyzed by classical clinical parameters (Ku-IHC4 score
vs
Ku-FFPE4 score;
χ
2
: 14.2
vs
2.5,
P
: 0.0002
vs
0.11). When patients were trichotomized into high-, intermediate- and low-risk groups using the thresholds determined from the approximately calculated 5-year relapse rate, Kaplan–Meier analyses showed a significant difference among the three groups in Ku-IHC4 score (log-rank,
P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0893-3952 1530-0285 |
DOI: | 10.1038/modpathol.2012.151 |