Spatial distribution of ectomycorrhizas and arbuscular mycorrhizas in Korup National Park rain forest, Cameroon, in relation to edaphic parameters
The frequent co-occurrence of ectomycorrhizas and arbuscular mycorrhizas in the same ecosystem raises the question about how two functionally different mycorrhizal associations exploit a spatially heterogeneous habitat. Horizontal (in plots along a transect of 3750 m crossing forest types of low and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New phytologist 1998-06, Vol.139 (2), p.311-320 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The frequent co-occurrence of ectomycorrhizas and arbuscular
mycorrhizas in the same ecosystem raises the
question about how two functionally different mycorrhizal associations
exploit a spatially heterogeneous habitat.
Horizontal (in plots along a transect of 3750 m crossing forest types
of low and high abundance of ectomycorrhizal
(ECM) host species) and vertical (across profiles of litter and
0–5 cm, 10–15 cm, 25–35 cm soil layers) distribution
of ectomycorrhizas and arbuscular mycorrhizas in relation to edaphic
parameters (pH, moisture, total carbon, total
nitrogen and extractable-phosphorus concentration) was compared in
Korup National Park rain forest, to test the
hypothesis that the two types of mycorrhiza exploit different niches.
No pattern was observed in either ECM or
arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fractional colonization with depth in
the profile even though most of the variation
in soil parameters was vertical. Only local (between monoliths
within plots) horizontal differences were found in
soil parameters. By contrast, horizontal differences in fractional
colonization were found between forest types, and
between monoliths, for ectomycorrhizas but only between monoliths for
arbuscular mycorrhizas. The lack of a
clear relationship between both horizontal and vertical distribution
of ECM and AM fractional colonization and
soil parameters suggests that both fungal groups are equally able
to colonize the same niche, at the scale of our
experiment. By contrast, a negative relationship was found between
AM and ECM fractional colonization in the
litter and 0–5 cm and 10–15 cm soil layers. This, in addition
to
the more heterogeneous horizontal distribution of
arbuscular mycorrhizas in forest areas dominated by ectomycorrhizas and
a patchy vertical distribution of the
former as opposed to a more coherent distribution of the latter, suggests
that both types of mycorrhizal fungi
compete for the same niche. The co-occurrence of ectomycorrhizas and
arbuscular mycorrhizas might be
explained by differences between ECM and AM hosts and fungi in their colonizing
abilities. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-646X 1469-8137 |
DOI: | 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1998.00190.x |