Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA level and CD4 count as prognostic markers and surrogate end points : A meta-analysis
Objective: To evaluate treatment-mediated changes in HIV-1 RNA and CD4 count as prognostic markers and surrogate end points for disease progression (AIDS/death). Methods: Data from 13,045 subjects in all 16 randomized trials comparing nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors and having H...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | AIDS research and human retroviruses 2000-08, Vol.16 (12), p.1123-1133 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective: To evaluate treatment-mediated changes in HIV-1 RNA and CD4 count as prognostic markers and surrogate end points for disease progression (AIDS/death). Methods: Data from 13,045 subjects in all 16 randomized trials comparing nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors and having HIV-1 RNA measurements at 24 weeks were obtained. A total of 3146 subjects had HIV-1 RNA and CD4 count determinations at 24 weeks after starting treatment. Results: At Week 24, the percentage of subjects experiencing an HIV-1 RNA decrease of >1 log sub(10) copies/ml or a CD4 count increase of >33% was similar (22% vs 25%). Changes in both markers at Week 24 were significant independent predictors of AIDS/death: across trials, the average reduction in hazard was 51% per 1 log sub(10) HIV-1 RNA copies/ml decrease (95% confidence interval: 41%, 59%) and 20% per 33% CD4 count increase (17%, 24%). In univariate analyses, the hazard ratio for AIDS/death in randomized treatment comparisons was significantly associated with differences between treatments in mean area under the curve of HIV-1 RNA changes to Weeks 8 and 24 (AUCMB) and mean CD4 change at Week 24, but, in multivariate analysis, only mean CD4 change was significant. Conclusions: Change in HIV-1 RNA, particularly using AUCMB, and in CD4 count should be measured to aid patient management and evaluation of treatment activity in clinical trials. However, short-term changes in these markers are imperfect as surrogate end points for long-term clinical outcome because two randomized treatment comparisons may show similar differences between treatments in marker changes but not similar differences in progression to AIDS/death. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0889-2229 1931-8405 |
DOI: | 10.1089/088922200414965 |