3D and 1D micromagnetic calculation for hard/soft bilayers with in-plane easy axes
Macroscopic hysteresis loops and microscopic magnetic moment distributions have been determined by three-dimensional (3D) as well as one-dimensional (1D) micromagnetic models for exchange-coupled Nd2Fe14B/α–Fe bilayers and carefully compared with each other. It is found that the results obtained fro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetism and magnetic materials 2012-12, Vol.324 (24), p.4231-4236 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Macroscopic hysteresis loops and microscopic magnetic moment distributions have been determined by three-dimensional (3D) as well as one-dimensional (1D) micromagnetic models for exchange-coupled Nd2Fe14B/α–Fe bilayers and carefully compared with each other. It is found that the results obtained from the two methods are consistent with each other, where the nucleation and coercive fields decrease monotonically as the soft layer thickness Ls increases whilst the largest maximum energy products (roughly 600kJ/m3) occur at Ls=5nm. Moreover, the calculated angular distributions in the thickness direction for the magnetic moments are similar. Nevertheless, the calculated critical fields and energy products by 3D OOMMF are systematically smaller than those given by the 1D model, mainly due to the local demagnetization fields, which are taken into account in the 3D calculation and ignored in the 1D calculation. It is demonstrated by the 3D calculation that the large demagnetization fields in the corners of the soft layers reduce the nucleation fields and thus facilitate the magnetic reversal. Such an effect enhances as Ls increases. When Ls=20nm, the differences between the coercivity is as large as 30%, while the nucleation fields obtained by the two methods have opposite signs.
► Self-consistent 3D and 1D calculations of hysteresis loops for hard/soft bilayers. ► 3D calculated critical fields and energy products systematically smaller than 1D. ► Difference for critical fields and energy products rise with soft layer thickness. ► Large demagnetization fields at film corner facilitates 3D nucleation. ► Similar angular distributions at thickness direction by both the methods. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0304-8853 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jmmm.2012.07.053 |