Inversion twinning in a second polymorph of the hydrochloride salt of the recreational drug ethylone

A second polymorph of the hydrochloride salt of the recreational drug ethylone, C12H16NO3+·Cl−, is reported [systematic name: (±)‐2‐ethylammonio‐1‐(3,4‐methylenedioxyphenyl)propane‐1‐one chloride]. This polymorph, denoted form (A), appears in crystallizations performed above 308 K. The originally re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta crystallographica. Section C, Crystal structure communications Crystal structure communications, 2015-04, Vol.71 (4), p.266-270
Hauptverfasser: Cameron, T. Stanley, Grossert, J. Stuart, Maheux, Chad R., Alarcon, Idralyn Q., Copeland, Catherine R., Linden, Anthony
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A second polymorph of the hydrochloride salt of the recreational drug ethylone, C12H16NO3+·Cl−, is reported [systematic name: (±)‐2‐ethylammonio‐1‐(3,4‐methylenedioxyphenyl)propane‐1‐one chloride]. This polymorph, denoted form (A), appears in crystallizations performed above 308 K. The originally reported form (B) [Wood et al. (2015). Acta Cryst. C71, 32–38] crystallizes preferentially at room temperature. The conformations of the cations in the two forms differ by a 180° rotation about the C—C bond linking the side chain to the aromatic ring. Hydrogen bonding links the cations and anions in both forms into similar extended chains in which any one chain contains only a single enantiomer of the chiral cation, but the packing of the ions is different. In form (A), the aromatic rings of adjacent chains interleave, but pack equally well if neighbouring chains contain the same or opposite enantiomorph of the cation. The consequence of this is then near perfect inversion twinning in the structure. In form (B), neighbouring chains are always inverted, leading to a centrosymmetric space group. The question as to why the polymorphs crystallize at slightly different temperatures has been examined by density functional theory (DFT) and lattice energy calculations and a consideration of packing compactness. The free energy (ΔG) of the crystal lattice for polymorph (A) lies some 52 kJ mol−1 above that of polymorph (B).
ISSN:2053-2296
0108-2701
2053-2296
1600-5759
DOI:10.1107/S2053229615004295