PTU-067Out-patient assessment for liver transplantation: a single centre experience

IntroductionAssessment for orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) traditionally requires admission to hospital. In 2010, the liver unit at the University Hospital Birmingham (UHB) launched the first UK-based out-patient assessment programme (OPA). This study aims to describe our experience, with spec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gut 2012-07, Vol.61 (Suppl 2), p.A211-A211
Hauptverfasser: Lim, T R, Armstrong, M J, Houlihan, D D, Wong, K, Cook, C, Turner, A, Perrin, M, Cantrill, J, Ashcroft, P, Hughes, D, Weijers, C, Holt, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:IntroductionAssessment for orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) traditionally requires admission to hospital. In 2010, the liver unit at the University Hospital Birmingham (UHB) launched the first UK-based out-patient assessment programme (OPA). This study aims to describe our experience, with specific focus on feasibility, efficacy, cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction.MethodsPatients undergoing elective LT assessment were retrospectively analysed between June 2010 and April 2011. Data collected included patient demographics/clinical features, LT assessment parameters, duration to listing/LT and reasons for LT refusal. An extensive cost evaluation was performed on both in- and out-patient LT assessment, including clinical tests, staffing and hospital facilities utilised. Patient satisfaction questionnaires were collected prospectively from April 2011 to November 2011.Results179 patients underwent LT assessment. 87/94 successfully completed OPA, with seven converted to in-patient LT assessment (IPA) due to pre-existing co-morbidity including refractory ascites and hepatic encephalopathy. All patients referred for OPA were triaged 2weeks prior to the assessment to ensure suitability. 92 patients successfully underwent IPA. 66/87 OPAs were subsequently listed for LT (median duration from OPA to listing 3days [0-306], of which 37/66 received a cadaveric graft. The reasons for OPAs not listed include: too early for LT (50.0%), contraindication to LT (42.9%) and patient refusal (7.1%). 53/92 IPAs were listed, mean duration 4days [1-39], of which 34/53 were transplanted. Reasons for IPAs not listed: contraindication to LT (48.2%), too early for LT (44.4%) and patient refusal (7.4%). A single IPA costs on average pound sterling 14[puncsp]441 as compared to pound sterling 11[puncsp]494 for an OPA. Overall satisfaction (mean score 9.6/10; 10=very satisfied, 1=very dissatisfied) and convenience (7.9/10) for patients undergoing OPA were high.ConclusionWe describe for first time that OPA is feasible, efficient and cost-effective. With increasing demand on hospital beds in the UK National Health Service, such a programme has the potential to reduce the burden on LT in-patient services.Abstract PTU-067 Table 1Patient demographics and clinical featuresOPA (n=87)IPA (n=92)Mean age ( plus or minus SD)52.3 ( plus or minus 1.3)55.0 ( plus or minus 0.9)Male sex (%)58.654.3AetiologyViral611Alcohol621HCC26 12Metabolic920Autoimmune/biliary3013Other101 5UKELD median [rang
ISSN:0017-5749
DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302514c.67