Rituximab in combination with CODOX‐M/IVAC: a retrospective analysis of 23 cases of non‐HIV related B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma with proliferation index >95
Summary The safety and efficacy of rituximab with CODOX‐M/IVAC (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, methotrexate/ifosfamide, etoposide, high dose cytarabine) was retrospectively analysed in 23 patients with non‐human immunodeficiency virus‐related B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma with proliferati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of haematology 2011-01, Vol.152 (2), p.175-181 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary
The safety and efficacy of rituximab with CODOX‐M/IVAC (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, methotrexate/ifosfamide, etoposide, high dose cytarabine) was retrospectively analysed in 23 patients with non‐human immunodeficiency virus‐related B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma with proliferation index >95% [14 with classical Burkitt lymphoma (BL), five with B‐cell lymphoma unclassifiable, with features intermediate between diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and BL, and four with DLBCL]. Six (26%) low‐risk (LR) patients received three cycles of CODOX‐M and 17 (74%) high‐risk (HR) cases were assigned to four cycles of alternating CODOX‐M/IVAC. Rituximab 375 mg/m2 was infused on days 1 and 10 of each cycle. Toxicity was comparable to that reported with CODOX‐M/IVAC, with no treatment‐related death. Two patients developed grade 3 rituximab‐induced delayed neutropenia, with no adverse outcome. After completing treatment, 83% LR patients and 71% HR patients achieved CR by positron emission tomography–computerized tomography (PET–CT). Three (13%) patients received salvage treatment. At a median follow‐up of 34 months (range = 18–75), 19 (83%) patients (100% LR and 74% HR) were alive, including one case undergoing salvage for late relapse. Four HR patients (17%) had died, three from primary progressive disease and one from treatment‐refractory relapse 2 months after achieving CR. These results with R‐CODOX‐M/R‐IVAC compare favourably with existing data using CODOX‐M/IVAC and warrant further prospective studies. The potential pitfalls of PET–CT to assess response are highlighted. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-1048 1365-2141 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08447.x |