Rapid assessment of technical competency: the 8-min suture test

Abstract Background Although simulation training and evaluation have become increasingly popular for teaching minimally invasive surgery, tools to measure open surgical skills remain underdeveloped. As there is increasing demand for objective measures of technical competency at the completion of sur...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of surgical research 2016-01, Vol.200 (1), p.46-52
Hauptverfasser: Day, Ryan W., MD, Fleming, Jason, MD, Katz, Matthew H., MD, Grubbs, Elizabeth, MD, Bednarski, Brian K., MD, Lee, Jeffrey E., MD, Aloia, Thomas A., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background Although simulation training and evaluation have become increasingly popular for teaching minimally invasive surgery, tools to measure open surgical skills remain underdeveloped. As there is increasing demand for objective measures of technical competency at the completion of surgical training (postgraduate year [PGY]-6 and -7), this project was designed to assess the feasibility, reliability, and validity of a novel open surgical skills evaluation tool, the 8-min suture test (8MST). Methods During an annual surgical skills laboratory session, fellows and residents were asked to complete a simulated end-to-end vascular anastomosis. They were limited to 8 min to perform the anastomosis between two 12-mm Dacron grafts mounted on a customized platform. Their real-time and video-recorded performance was scored by two blinded evaluators and compared with their faculty-rated technical performance on clinical rotations completed around the time of 8MST administration. Results PGY-6 and PGY-7 trainees were compared across several domains including 8MST total score (4.6 versus 5.5, P = 0.030), 8MST setup score (2.3 versus 2.4, P  = 0.797), 8MST technical score (2.3 versus 3.1, P  = 0.026), and clinical performance score (3.1 versus 3.6, P  = 0.006). Comparison of 8MST total score to the clinical performance score identified a strong relationship with a Pearson r  = 0.55 ( P  
ISSN:0022-4804
1095-8673
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2015.06.057