The role of imaging in the management of adults with diffuse low grade glioma: A systematic review and evidence-based clinical practice guideline
Question What is the optimal imaging technique to be used in the diagnosis of a suspected low grade glioma, specifically: which anatomic imaging sequences are critical for most accurately identifying or diagnosing a low grade glioma (LGG) and do non-anatomic imaging methods and/or sequences add to t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Neuro - Oncology 2015-12, Vol.125 (3), p.457-479 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Question
What is the optimal imaging technique to be used in the diagnosis of a suspected low grade glioma, specifically: which anatomic imaging sequences are critical for most accurately identifying or diagnosing a low grade glioma (LGG) and do non-anatomic imaging methods and/or sequences add to the diagnostic specificity of suspected low grade gliomas?
Target population
These recommendations apply to adults with a newly diagnosed lesion with a suspected or histopathologically proven LGG.
Recommendation
Level II
In patients with a suspected brain tumor, the minimum magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exam should be an anatomic exam with both T2 weighted and pre- and post-gadolinium contrast enhanced T1 weighted imaging.
Critical imaging for the identification and diagnosis of low grade glioma
Level II
In patients with a suspected brain tumor, anatomic imaging sequences should include T1 and T2 weighted and Fluid Attenuation Inversion Recovery (FLAIR) MR sequences and will include T1 weighted imaging after the administration of gadolinium based contrast. Computed tomography (CT) can provide additional information regarding calcification or hemorrhage, which may narrow the differential diagnosis. At a minimum, these anatomic sequences can help identify a lesion as well as its location, and potential for surgical intervention.
Improvement of diagnostic specificity with the addition of non-anatomic (physiologic and advanced imaging) to anatomic imaging
Level II
Class II evidence from multiple studies and a significant number of Class III series support the addition of diffusion and perfusion weighted MR imaging in the assessment of suspected LGGs, for the purposes of discriminating the potential for tumor subtypes and identification of suspicion of higher grade diagnoses.
Level III
Multiple series offer Class III evidence to support the potential for magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) and nuclear medicine methods including positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography imaging to offer additional diagnostic specificity although these are less well defined and their roles in clinical practice are still being defined.
Question
Which imaging sequences or parameters best predict the biological behavior or prognosis for patients with LGG?
Target population
These recommendations apply to adults with a newly diagnosed lesion with a suspected or histopathologically proven LGG.
Recommendation
Anatomic and advanced imaging methods and prog |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0167-594X 1573-7373 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11060-015-1908-9 |