Evidence for indirect effects of pesticide seed treatments on weed seed banks in maize and soybean

•Pesticide seed treatments are common in large acreage row crops.•Natural enemies of weed seeds may be affected by pesticides.•Pesticide seed treatments reduced the diversity of the soil seed bank.•Trends in weed seed density, richness and evenness were consistent with our hypotheses. Use of pestici...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agriculture, ecosystems & environment ecosystems & environment, 2016-01, Vol.216, p.269-273
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Richard G., Atwood, Lesley W., Morris, Matthew B., Mortensen, David A., Koide, Roger T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Pesticide seed treatments are common in large acreage row crops.•Natural enemies of weed seeds may be affected by pesticides.•Pesticide seed treatments reduced the diversity of the soil seed bank.•Trends in weed seed density, richness and evenness were consistent with our hypotheses. Use of pesticide seed treatments (coating seeds with insecticides and/or fungicides) is a common practice in conventional maize and soybean production. Despite their widespread use, however, little is known about how this practice affects soil food webs and their associated ecosystem services. We conducted a two-year field experiment in central Pennsylvania, USA in which identical genotypes of maize (2013) and soybean (2014) were planted with and without pesticide seed treatments in a completely randomized design with five replications. We sampled the weed seed bank during both the corn (fall 2013) and soybean (summer 2014) phases of the rotation. After each sampling event, soil samples were transported to a temperature-controlled greenhouse facility and weed seed bank composition and density was assessed over a period of four months via the direct germination method. Seed bank data were analyzed with ANOVA and several multivariate techniques to determine the effect of pesticide seed treatments on seed bank density, diversity, and species composition. We hypothesized that pesticide seed treatments reduce the abundance of natural enemies (e.g., soil-dwelling seed predators and pathogens) that damage or destroy weed seeds in the soil, and therefore seed banks in treated plots would be larger and less diverse than those in untreated plots. In accordance with our hypothesis, weed seed banks were significantly less diverse in treated compared to untreated control plots (Shannon and Simpson’s indices of diversity, p
ISSN:0167-8809
1873-2305
DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2015.10.008