On the correlation between allocation to defence and regrowth in plants
Because storage of resources to regrow after damage and investment in defence draw upon the same resource pool, it has been argued that they should show a negative correlation. We sketch a model for optimal allocation to defence and to storage for regrowth. In the model generalist herbivores exert a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Oikos 2000-03, Vol.88 (3), p.503-508 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Because storage of resources to regrow after damage and investment in defence draw upon the same resource pool, it has been argued that they should show a negative correlation. We sketch a model for optimal allocation to defence and to storage for regrowth. In the model generalist herbivores exert a constant herbivore pressure against which the plant can defend itself. With discrete intervals, disturbance occurs by an external cause against which the plant cannot defend. This could be an abiotic disturbance or the outbreak of a specialist herbivore that is unaffected by the defence. If we compare genotypes or species, each adapted to its own habitat, then a positive correlation or no correlation between allocation to defence and to regrowth is to be expected. The parameter space in which plants should both defend and store resources for regrowth is limited. Especially under favourable growing conditions, plants should only allocate to growth. We discuss some experimental measures of the regrowth capacity of plants in the context of our model and argue that these should be used with caution. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0030-1299 1600-0706 |
DOI: | 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.880305.x |