No Benefit of Complex Fractionated Atrial Electrogram Ablation in Addition to Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Ablation and Linear Ablation: Benefit of Complex Ablation Study
BACKGROUND—The optimal ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS—This multicentre randomized study compared circumferential pulmonary vein ablation+linear ablation (control arm) versus circumferential pulmonary vein ablation+linear ablation+comple...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology 2015-12, Vol.8 (6), p.1316-1324 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND—The optimal ablation strategy for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear.
METHODS AND RESULTS—This multicentre randomized study compared circumferential pulmonary vein ablation+linear ablation (control arm) versus circumferential pulmonary vein ablation+linear ablation+complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation (CFAE arm) in patients with persistent AF. Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation was performed followed by roof and mitral isthmus ablation, before CFAE ablation in the CFAE arm. Ablation strategy was maintained at the first redo procedure. Sixty-five patients were recruited in each arm. The mean age was 61±10 years, 75% were men, median AF duration was 2 years, 42% had long-lasting persistent AF, 68% had associated cardiovascular disease, mean left atrial dimension was 46±6 mm, and median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 2. Ablation and procedure times were significantly longer in the CFAE arm (70±20 versus 55±17; 201±35 versus 152±45 minutes; P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1941-3149 1941-3084 |
DOI: | 10.1161/CIRCEP.114.002504 |