Validation of a five-factor model of a Chinese Mandarin version of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (CMV-PANSS) in a sample of 813 schizophrenia patients

AbstractObjectivesThe Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is one of the most widely used instruments for measuring the severity of schizophrenia. However, until now, there has not been a published, validated Chinese Mandarin version of the five-factor model PANSS with confirmatory factor an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Schizophrenia research 2015-12, Vol.169 (1), p.489-490
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Bo-Jian, Lan, Tsuo-Hung, Hu, Tsung-Ming, Lee, Shin-Min, Liou, Jiunn-Ying
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:AbstractObjectivesThe Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is one of the most widely used instruments for measuring the severity of schizophrenia. However, until now, there has not been a published, validated Chinese Mandarin version of the five-factor model PANSS with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for schizophrenic patients in Taiwan. MethodsA total of 813 subjects were recruited. Internal consistency was evaluated with Cronbach's alpha coefficient. For test re-test reliability, 57 patients were reassessed and intra-class correlation coefficients were calculated. For validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) using a Structured Equation Model were implemented to identify the factor model. ResultsThe Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.928. The intra-class coefficient was 0.878 (95% CI: 0.79–0.92). The final model was composed of five factors. EFA explained a total of 64.2% of the variance. CFA indicated a good fitting model. Except for the PANSS items G7 (motor retardation), G8 (uncooperativeness), N5 (abstract thinking), and G10 (disorientation), this study found that the items loaded on these factors were similar to the consensus items published in prior studies. ConclusionsIn summary, these findings support the Chinese Mandarin version of the PANSS as a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of the severity of psychopathology in hospitalized, stable patients with schizophrenia. More effective and specific treatment models targeting sub-culture differences are expected to be developed in future studies.
ISSN:0920-9964
1573-2509
DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2015.09.011