Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein Variants Have Differential Stability but Uniform Inhibition by Torcetrapib

Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) is an important modulator of high density lipoprotein cholesterol in humans and thus considered to be a therapeutic target for preventing cardiovascular disease. The gene encoding CETP has been shown to be highly variable, with multiple single nucleotide pol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of biological chemistry 2005-04, Vol.280 (15), p.14918-14922
Hauptverfasser: Lloyd, David B., Lira, Maruja E., Wood, Linda S., Durham, L. Kathryn, Freeman, Thomas B., Preston, Gregory M., Qiu, Xiayang, Sugarman, Eliot, Bonnette, Peter, Lanzetti, Anthony, Milos, Patrice M., Thompson, John F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) is an important modulator of high density lipoprotein cholesterol in humans and thus considered to be a therapeutic target for preventing cardiovascular disease. The gene encoding CETP has been shown to be highly variable, with multiple single nucleotide polymorphisms responsible for altering both its transcription and sequence. Examining nine missense variants of CETP, we found some had significant associations with CETP mass and high density lipoprotein cholesterol levels. Two variants, Pro-373 and Gln-451, appear to be more stable in vivo, an observation mirrored by partial proteolysis studies performed in vitro. Because these naturally occurring variant proteins are potentially present in clinical populations that will be treated with CETP inhibitors, all commonly occurring haplotypes were tested to determine whether the proteins they encode could be inhibited by torcetrapib, a compound currently in clinical trials in combination with atorvastatin. Torcetrapib behaved similarly with all variants, with no significant differences in inhibition.
ISSN:0021-9258
1083-351X
DOI:10.1074/jbc.M500523200