Rural household incomes and land grabbing in Cambodia

•We analyze environmentally augmented rural household-level income in Cambodia.•The economic impacts of land concessions on rural incomes were quantified.•Marginal lands constitute a significant source of income for rural households.•All rural households are reliant on land and susceptible to land g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Land use policy 2015-11, Vol.48, p.317-328
Hauptverfasser: Jiao, Xi, Smith-Hall, Carsten, Theilade, Ida
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We analyze environmentally augmented rural household-level income in Cambodia.•The economic impacts of land concessions on rural incomes were quantified.•Marginal lands constitute a significant source of income for rural households.•All rural households are reliant on land and susceptible to land grabbing.•Economic land concessions in Cambodia decrease rural household incomes. This paper empirically quantifies environmentally augmented rural household incomes in Cambodia and analyzes how economic land concessions (ELCs) affect such incomes. Data is derived from a structured survey of 600 randomly selected households in 15 villages in three study sites in Cambodia, where local livelihoods are highly reliant on access to land and natural resources, supported by qualitative data from focus group discussions. Gini coefficient decomposition, multiple regression models, and propensity score matching (PSM) models were employed to analyze the composition of income portfolios, determinants of major income sources, and the impacts of land grabbing on incomes. Results documented high reliance on environmental income (32–35% of total household income) and farm income (51–53%) across income quartiles; demonstrated the variation in product composition across quartiles and the contribution of each major product to income inequality; and identified the main household characteristics influencing absolute and relative incomes. ELCs were found to consistently have negative impacts on household total income, environmental income, size of available cultivable land and livestock holdings, and increasing the distance to forests. The total household annual income subjects to ELCs were estimated to decrease by 15–19%. While providing some employment opportunities, we find no evidence of positive income effects of ELCs on households in the areas where ELCs are located.
ISSN:0264-8377
1873-5754
DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.008