Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Versus Routine Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: Five-Year Clinical Outcomes of DEFER-DES Trial
BACKGROUND—We aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes between fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided and routine drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with an intermediate coronary stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS—A total of 229 patients with an angiographically intermediate coronary...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions 2015-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e002442-e002442 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | BACKGROUND—We aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes between fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided and routine drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with an intermediate coronary stenosis.
METHODS AND RESULTS—A total of 229 patients with an angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis were randomly assigned to FFR-guided or Routine-DES implantation group. For FFR-guided group (n=114), treatment strategy was determined according to the target vessel FFR (FFR |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1941-7640 1941-7632 |
DOI: | 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002442 |