Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Versus Routine Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients With Intermediate Coronary Stenosis: Five-Year Clinical Outcomes of DEFER-DES Trial

BACKGROUND—We aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes between fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided and routine drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with an intermediate coronary stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS—A total of 229 patients with an angiographically intermediate coronary...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions 2015-12, Vol.8 (12), p.e002442-e002442
Hauptverfasser: Park, Sang Hyun, Jeon, Ki-Hyun, Lee, Joo Myung, Nam, Chang-Wook, Doh, Joon-Hyung, Lee, Bong-Ki, Rha, Seung-Woon, Yoo, Ki-dong, Jung, Kyung Tae, Cho, Young-Seok, Lee, Hae-Young, Youn, Tae-Jin, Chung, Woo-Young, Koo, Bon-Kwon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND—We aimed to compare the long-term clinical outcomes between fractional flow reserve (FFR)–guided and routine drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with an intermediate coronary stenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS—A total of 229 patients with an angiographically intermediate coronary stenosis were randomly assigned to FFR-guided or Routine-DES implantation group. For FFR-guided group (n=114), treatment strategy was determined according to the target vessel FFR (FFR
ISSN:1941-7640
1941-7632
DOI:10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002442