Contributions of Heterosis and Epistasis to Hybrid Fitness

Early‐generation hybrid fitness is difficult to interpret because heterosis can obscure the effects of hybrid breakdown. We used controlled reciprocal crosses and common garden experiments to distinguish between effects of heterosis and nuclear and cytonuclear epistasis among morphotypes and advance...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The American naturalist 2005-11, Vol.166 (5), p.E124-E139
Hauptverfasser: Rhode, Jennifer M., Cruzan, Mitchell B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Early‐generation hybrid fitness is difficult to interpret because heterosis can obscure the effects of hybrid breakdown. We used controlled reciprocal crosses and common garden experiments to distinguish between effects of heterosis and nuclear and cytonuclear epistasis among morphotypes and advanced‐generation hybrid derivative populations in thePiriqueta caroliniana(Turneraceae) plant complex. Seed germination, growth, and sexual reproduction of first‐generation hybrids, inbred parental lines, and outbred parental lines were compared under field conditions. Average vegetative performance was greater for hybrids than for inbred lines, and first‐season growth was similar for hybrids and outbred parental lines. Hybrid survival surpassed that of inbred lines and was equal to or greater than outbred lines’ survival, and more F1than parental plants reproduced. Reductions in hybrid fitness due to Dobzhansky‐Muller incompatibilities (epistasis among divergent genetic elements) were expressed as differences in vegetative growth, survival, and reproduction between plants from reciprocal crosses for both F1and backcross hybrid generations. Comparing performance of hybrids against parental genotypes from intra‐ and interpopulation crosses allowed a more robust prediction of F1hybrids' success and more accurate interpretations of the genetic architecture of F1hybrid vigor.
ISSN:0003-0147
1537-5323
DOI:10.1086/491798