De-escalation chemotherapy and hematological profiles in patients with advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma

Background There is a need to develop treatment strategies that are less toxic than BEACOPPescalated x6 cycles, the standard-of-care in advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients. Objective To compare short-term hematological toxicity in advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients treated with either BEACOPPesca...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of clinical pharmacy 2015-12, Vol.37 (6), p.1033-1037
Hauptverfasser: Seignez, Antoine, Casasnovas, Olivier, Ferrant, Emmanuelle, Bastie, Jean Noel, Mondoloni, Pauline, Aho, Ludwig Serge, Boulin, Mathieu
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background There is a need to develop treatment strategies that are less toxic than BEACOPPescalated x6 cycles, the standard-of-care in advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients. Objective To compare short-term hematological toxicity in advanced Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients treated with either BEACOPPescalated x6 cycles (standard group) or BEACOPPescalated x2 followed by ABVD x4 cycles (experimental group). Method In 27 patients, we compared injections of erythropoiesis stimulating agent and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, transfusions, hospitalization days, as well as hemoglobin, platelet, leukocyte levels. Method In 27 patients, we compared injections of erythropoiesis stimulating agent and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, transfusions, hospitalization days, as well as hemoglobin, platelet, leukocyte levels. Results The mean number of erythropoiesis stimulating agent and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor injections, platelet transfusions and hospitalization days was significantly lower in the experimental group (erythropoiesis stimulating agents: mean difference −6.6 ± 2.4, p  = 0.005; granulocyte colony-stimulating factors: mean difference −8.3 ± 3.6, p  = 0.020, platelet transfusions: mean difference −0.6 ± 0.3, p  = 0.035; hospitalization days: mean difference: −8.5 ± 1.7 days, p  
ISSN:2210-7703
2210-7711
DOI:10.1007/s11096-015-0201-5