Comparison of lyophilized versus liquid modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) formulations and subcutaneous versus intradermal routes of administration in healthy vaccinia-naïve subjects

Highlights • Lyophilized MVA was more immunogenic than the current liquid formulation of MVA. • The lower ID dose of MVA was immunologically non-inferior to the standard SC dose. • The ID route resulted in more erythema and/or induration than the SC route. • The ID route may increase the number of a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Vaccine 2015-09, Vol.33 (39), p.5225-5234
Hauptverfasser: Frey, Sharon E, Wald, Anna, Edupuganti, Srilatha, Jackson, Lisa A, Stapleton, Jack T, Sahly, Hana El, El-Kamary, Samer S, Edwards, Kathryn, Keyserling, Harry, Winokur, Patricia, Keitel, Wendy, Hill, Heather, Goll, Johannes B, Anderson, Edwin L, Graham, Irene L, Johnston, Christine, Mulligan, Mark, Rouphael, Nadine, Atmar, Robert, Patel, Shital, Chen, Wilbur, Kotloff, Karen, Creech, C. Buddy, Chaplin, Paul, Belshe, Robert B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Highlights • Lyophilized MVA was more immunogenic than the current liquid formulation of MVA. • The lower ID dose of MVA was immunologically non-inferior to the standard SC dose. • The ID route resulted in more erythema and/or induration than the SC route. • The ID route may increase the number of available doses in an emergency situation.
ISSN:0264-410X
1873-2518
DOI:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.075