Patient delivery quality assurance for linac-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy using solid state detectors

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how to perform and define appropriate action levels for the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery quality assurance (DQA) for both linear accelerator (linac) and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans using a 2D array diode detector. MapCHECK (Sun...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Radiation measurements 2011-12, Vol.46 (12), p.1993-1995
Hauptverfasser: Chong, Ngot Swan, Lee, Jason J.S., Kung, Wei-Hsiang, Chen, Chien-An, Hsieh, Chen-Hsi, Tien, Hui-Ju, Lin, Chi-Ta, Yeh, Hsin-Pei, Wu, Le-Jung, Huang, Hsien-Da, Shueng, Pei-Wei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1995
container_issue 12
container_start_page 1993
container_title Radiation measurements
container_volume 46
creator Chong, Ngot Swan
Lee, Jason J.S.
Kung, Wei-Hsiang
Chen, Chien-An
Hsieh, Chen-Hsi
Tien, Hui-Ju
Lin, Chi-Ta
Yeh, Hsin-Pei
Wu, Le-Jung
Huang, Hsien-Da
Shueng, Pei-Wei
description The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how to perform and define appropriate action levels for the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery quality assurance (DQA) for both linear accelerator (linac) and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans using a 2D array diode detector. MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL, USA) was used to perform the DQA measurements of patient plans at various sites: brain, head and neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis, spine, bone and others. The measured and planned doses were compared using gamma analysis with a total dose discrepancy of 3% or a gradient difference of 3 mm criteria. DQAs for 507 HT and 380 linac-based IMRT plans were performed, and the mean diode percentage passing rates for 3%/3 mm criteria were 93.8% and 95.1% respectively. For HT delivery, 4.6% and 9.5% of the plans had the passing rates below 80% and 85%, while for linac-based IMRT, 7.4% of the plans had the passing rates lower than 90%. Applying confidence limit with multiplier of 1, action levels for passing rates of 87% and 90% are recommended for HT and IMRT plans respectively. ► Quality assurance was performed for 7–9 fields IMRT and helical tomotherapy plans. ► Confidence limit with multiplier of 1 was used to define the results action levels. ► For helical tomotherapy plans, the overall action level is recommended to be 87%. ► For IMRT linac plans, the recommended overall action level is 90%.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.08.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1744716775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1350448711003878</els_id><sourcerecordid>1010880724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-7662c9f62ac5c9d3e93fc393355834dd21d7c14ac68fc3bafa3b3bf623ef57dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhk1poWnan1DQpdCLXX1a9qmU0I9AQkpJz2JWGjfaeq2NRg7sv6-WXXrNSYN43hl43qZ5L3gnuOg_bbsMYYdAneRCdHzoONcvmgsx2LHlozQv66wMb7Ue7OvmDdGWV2LszUXz9yeUiEthAef4hPnAHleYYzkwIFozLB7ZlDKb4wK-3QBhYNe3v-4ZLIE91IyHmZW0S-UBM-wPbKW4_GGU5hgYFShYNxf0JWV627yaYCZ8d34vm9_fvt5f_Whv7r5fX325ab3mprS276Ufp16CN34MCkc1eTUqZcygdAhSBOuFBt8P9X8DE6iN2lRe4WRsCOqy-Xjau8_pcUUqbhfJ4zzDgmklJ6zWVvTWmudRLvgwcCt1Rc0J9TkRZZzcPscd5EOFjlzvtu7cgzv24PjgquWa-3A-AVRlTUenkf6HpVHWSiEr9_nEYVXzFDE78rUZjyHm6s-FFJ-59A99_qJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1010880724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient delivery quality assurance for linac-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy using solid state detectors</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chong, Ngot Swan ; Lee, Jason J.S. ; Kung, Wei-Hsiang ; Chen, Chien-An ; Hsieh, Chen-Hsi ; Tien, Hui-Ju ; Lin, Chi-Ta ; Yeh, Hsin-Pei ; Wu, Le-Jung ; Huang, Hsien-Da ; Shueng, Pei-Wei</creator><creatorcontrib>Chong, Ngot Swan ; Lee, Jason J.S. ; Kung, Wei-Hsiang ; Chen, Chien-An ; Hsieh, Chen-Hsi ; Tien, Hui-Ju ; Lin, Chi-Ta ; Yeh, Hsin-Pei ; Wu, Le-Jung ; Huang, Hsien-Da ; Shueng, Pei-Wei</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how to perform and define appropriate action levels for the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery quality assurance (DQA) for both linear accelerator (linac) and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans using a 2D array diode detector. MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL, USA) was used to perform the DQA measurements of patient plans at various sites: brain, head and neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis, spine, bone and others. The measured and planned doses were compared using gamma analysis with a total dose discrepancy of 3% or a gradient difference of 3 mm criteria. DQAs for 507 HT and 380 linac-based IMRT plans were performed, and the mean diode percentage passing rates for 3%/3 mm criteria were 93.8% and 95.1% respectively. For HT delivery, 4.6% and 9.5% of the plans had the passing rates below 80% and 85%, while for linac-based IMRT, 7.4% of the plans had the passing rates lower than 90%. Applying confidence limit with multiplier of 1, action levels for passing rates of 87% and 90% are recommended for HT and IMRT plans respectively. ► Quality assurance was performed for 7–9 fields IMRT and helical tomotherapy plans. ► Confidence limit with multiplier of 1 was used to define the results action levels. ► For helical tomotherapy plans, the overall action level is recommended to be 87%. ► For IMRT linac plans, the recommended overall action level is 90%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-4487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0925</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.08.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Arrays ; Bones ; Criteria ; Detectors ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geochronology ; Heat treatment ; Helical ; Helical Tomotherapy ; Intensity modulated radiation therapy ; Isotope geochemistry. Geochronology ; Linear accelerator ; Linear accelerators ; MapCHECK ; Patients ; Quality assurance</subject><ispartof>Radiation measurements, 2011-12, Vol.46 (12), p.1993-1995</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-7662c9f62ac5c9d3e93fc393355834dd21d7c14ac68fc3bafa3b3bf623ef57dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-7662c9f62ac5c9d3e93fc393355834dd21d7c14ac68fc3bafa3b3bf623ef57dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.08.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3548,23928,23929,25138,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=25377212$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chong, Ngot Swan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jason J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kung, Wei-Hsiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chien-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, Chen-Hsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tien, Hui-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chi-Ta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeh, Hsin-Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Le-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Hsien-Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shueng, Pei-Wei</creatorcontrib><title>Patient delivery quality assurance for linac-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy using solid state detectors</title><title>Radiation measurements</title><description>The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how to perform and define appropriate action levels for the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery quality assurance (DQA) for both linear accelerator (linac) and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans using a 2D array diode detector. MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL, USA) was used to perform the DQA measurements of patient plans at various sites: brain, head and neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis, spine, bone and others. The measured and planned doses were compared using gamma analysis with a total dose discrepancy of 3% or a gradient difference of 3 mm criteria. DQAs for 507 HT and 380 linac-based IMRT plans were performed, and the mean diode percentage passing rates for 3%/3 mm criteria were 93.8% and 95.1% respectively. For HT delivery, 4.6% and 9.5% of the plans had the passing rates below 80% and 85%, while for linac-based IMRT, 7.4% of the plans had the passing rates lower than 90%. Applying confidence limit with multiplier of 1, action levels for passing rates of 87% and 90% are recommended for HT and IMRT plans respectively. ► Quality assurance was performed for 7–9 fields IMRT and helical tomotherapy plans. ► Confidence limit with multiplier of 1 was used to define the results action levels. ► For helical tomotherapy plans, the overall action level is recommended to be 87%. ► For IMRT linac plans, the recommended overall action level is 90%.</description><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Detectors</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geochronology</subject><subject>Heat treatment</subject><subject>Helical</subject><subject>Helical Tomotherapy</subject><subject>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</subject><subject>Isotope geochemistry. Geochronology</subject><subject>Linear accelerator</subject><subject>Linear accelerators</subject><subject>MapCHECK</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><issn>1350-4487</issn><issn>1879-0925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhk1poWnan1DQpdCLXX1a9qmU0I9AQkpJz2JWGjfaeq2NRg7sv6-WXXrNSYN43hl43qZ5L3gnuOg_bbsMYYdAneRCdHzoONcvmgsx2LHlozQv66wMb7Ue7OvmDdGWV2LszUXz9yeUiEthAef4hPnAHleYYzkwIFozLB7ZlDKb4wK-3QBhYNe3v-4ZLIE91IyHmZW0S-UBM-wPbKW4_GGU5hgYFShYNxf0JWV627yaYCZ8d34vm9_fvt5f_Whv7r5fX325ab3mprS276Ufp16CN34MCkc1eTUqZcygdAhSBOuFBt8P9X8DE6iN2lRe4WRsCOqy-Xjau8_pcUUqbhfJ4zzDgmklJ6zWVvTWmudRLvgwcCt1Rc0J9TkRZZzcPscd5EOFjlzvtu7cgzv24PjgquWa-3A-AVRlTUenkf6HpVHWSiEr9_nEYVXzFDE78rUZjyHm6s-FFJ-59A99_qJw</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Chong, Ngot Swan</creator><creator>Lee, Jason J.S.</creator><creator>Kung, Wei-Hsiang</creator><creator>Chen, Chien-An</creator><creator>Hsieh, Chen-Hsi</creator><creator>Tien, Hui-Ju</creator><creator>Lin, Chi-Ta</creator><creator>Yeh, Hsin-Pei</creator><creator>Wu, Le-Jung</creator><creator>Huang, Hsien-Da</creator><creator>Shueng, Pei-Wei</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Patient delivery quality assurance for linac-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy using solid state detectors</title><author>Chong, Ngot Swan ; Lee, Jason J.S. ; Kung, Wei-Hsiang ; Chen, Chien-An ; Hsieh, Chen-Hsi ; Tien, Hui-Ju ; Lin, Chi-Ta ; Yeh, Hsin-Pei ; Wu, Le-Jung ; Huang, Hsien-Da ; Shueng, Pei-Wei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-7662c9f62ac5c9d3e93fc393355834dd21d7c14ac68fc3bafa3b3bf623ef57dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Detectors</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geochronology</topic><topic>Heat treatment</topic><topic>Helical</topic><topic>Helical Tomotherapy</topic><topic>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</topic><topic>Isotope geochemistry. Geochronology</topic><topic>Linear accelerator</topic><topic>Linear accelerators</topic><topic>MapCHECK</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chong, Ngot Swan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jason J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kung, Wei-Hsiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chien-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, Chen-Hsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tien, Hui-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chi-Ta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeh, Hsin-Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Le-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Hsien-Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shueng, Pei-Wei</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Radiation measurements</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chong, Ngot Swan</au><au>Lee, Jason J.S.</au><au>Kung, Wei-Hsiang</au><au>Chen, Chien-An</au><au>Hsieh, Chen-Hsi</au><au>Tien, Hui-Ju</au><au>Lin, Chi-Ta</au><au>Yeh, Hsin-Pei</au><au>Wu, Le-Jung</au><au>Huang, Hsien-Da</au><au>Shueng, Pei-Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient delivery quality assurance for linac-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy using solid state detectors</atitle><jtitle>Radiation measurements</jtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1993</spage><epage>1995</epage><pages>1993-1995</pages><issn>1350-4487</issn><eissn>1879-0925</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how to perform and define appropriate action levels for the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery quality assurance (DQA) for both linear accelerator (linac) and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans using a 2D array diode detector. MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL, USA) was used to perform the DQA measurements of patient plans at various sites: brain, head and neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis, spine, bone and others. The measured and planned doses were compared using gamma analysis with a total dose discrepancy of 3% or a gradient difference of 3 mm criteria. DQAs for 507 HT and 380 linac-based IMRT plans were performed, and the mean diode percentage passing rates for 3%/3 mm criteria were 93.8% and 95.1% respectively. For HT delivery, 4.6% and 9.5% of the plans had the passing rates below 80% and 85%, while for linac-based IMRT, 7.4% of the plans had the passing rates lower than 90%. Applying confidence limit with multiplier of 1, action levels for passing rates of 87% and 90% are recommended for HT and IMRT plans respectively. ► Quality assurance was performed for 7–9 fields IMRT and helical tomotherapy plans. ► Confidence limit with multiplier of 1 was used to define the results action levels. ► For helical tomotherapy plans, the overall action level is recommended to be 87%. ► For IMRT linac plans, the recommended overall action level is 90%.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.08.004</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1350-4487
ispartof Radiation measurements, 2011-12, Vol.46 (12), p.1993-1995
issn 1350-4487
1879-0925
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1744716775
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Arrays
Bones
Criteria
Detectors
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Geochronology
Heat treatment
Helical
Helical Tomotherapy
Intensity modulated radiation therapy
Isotope geochemistry. Geochronology
Linear accelerator
Linear accelerators
MapCHECK
Patients
Quality assurance
title Patient delivery quality assurance for linac-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy using solid state detectors
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A32%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20delivery%20quality%20assurance%20for%20linac-based%20IMRT%20and%20helical%20tomotherapy%20using%20solid%20state%20detectors&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20measurements&rft.au=Chong,%20Ngot%20Swan&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1993&rft.epage=1995&rft.pages=1993-1995&rft.issn=1350-4487&rft.eissn=1879-0925&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.08.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1010880724%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1010880724&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1350448711003878&rfr_iscdi=true