Patient delivery quality assurance for linac-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy using solid state detectors
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how to perform and define appropriate action levels for the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery quality assurance (DQA) for both linear accelerator (linac) and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans using a 2D array diode detector. MapCHECK (Sun...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Radiation measurements 2011-12, Vol.46 (12), p.1993-1995 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1995 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1993 |
container_title | Radiation measurements |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | Chong, Ngot Swan Lee, Jason J.S. Kung, Wei-Hsiang Chen, Chien-An Hsieh, Chen-Hsi Tien, Hui-Ju Lin, Chi-Ta Yeh, Hsin-Pei Wu, Le-Jung Huang, Hsien-Da Shueng, Pei-Wei |
description | The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how to perform and define appropriate action levels for the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery quality assurance (DQA) for both linear accelerator (linac) and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans using a 2D array diode detector. MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL, USA) was used to perform the DQA measurements of patient plans at various sites: brain, head and neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis, spine, bone and others. The measured and planned doses were compared using gamma analysis with a total dose discrepancy of 3% or a gradient difference of 3 mm criteria. DQAs for 507 HT and 380 linac-based IMRT plans were performed, and the mean diode percentage passing rates for 3%/3 mm criteria were 93.8% and 95.1% respectively. For HT delivery, 4.6% and 9.5% of the plans had the passing rates below 80% and 85%, while for linac-based IMRT, 7.4% of the plans had the passing rates lower than 90%. Applying confidence limit with multiplier of 1, action levels for passing rates of 87% and 90% are recommended for HT and IMRT plans respectively.
► Quality assurance was performed for 7–9 fields IMRT and helical tomotherapy plans. ► Confidence limit with multiplier of 1 was used to define the results action levels. ► For helical tomotherapy plans, the overall action level is recommended to be 87%. ► For IMRT linac plans, the recommended overall action level is 90%. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.08.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1744716775</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1350448711003878</els_id><sourcerecordid>1010880724</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-7662c9f62ac5c9d3e93fc393355834dd21d7c14ac68fc3bafa3b3bf623ef57dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhk1poWnan1DQpdCLXX1a9qmU0I9AQkpJz2JWGjfaeq2NRg7sv6-WXXrNSYN43hl43qZ5L3gnuOg_bbsMYYdAneRCdHzoONcvmgsx2LHlozQv66wMb7Ue7OvmDdGWV2LszUXz9yeUiEthAef4hPnAHleYYzkwIFozLB7ZlDKb4wK-3QBhYNe3v-4ZLIE91IyHmZW0S-UBM-wPbKW4_GGU5hgYFShYNxf0JWV627yaYCZ8d34vm9_fvt5f_Whv7r5fX325ab3mprS276Ufp16CN34MCkc1eTUqZcygdAhSBOuFBt8P9X8DE6iN2lRe4WRsCOqy-Xjau8_pcUUqbhfJ4zzDgmklJ6zWVvTWmudRLvgwcCt1Rc0J9TkRZZzcPscd5EOFjlzvtu7cgzv24PjgquWa-3A-AVRlTUenkf6HpVHWSiEr9_nEYVXzFDE78rUZjyHm6s-FFJ-59A99_qJw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1010880724</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient delivery quality assurance for linac-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy using solid state detectors</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chong, Ngot Swan ; Lee, Jason J.S. ; Kung, Wei-Hsiang ; Chen, Chien-An ; Hsieh, Chen-Hsi ; Tien, Hui-Ju ; Lin, Chi-Ta ; Yeh, Hsin-Pei ; Wu, Le-Jung ; Huang, Hsien-Da ; Shueng, Pei-Wei</creator><creatorcontrib>Chong, Ngot Swan ; Lee, Jason J.S. ; Kung, Wei-Hsiang ; Chen, Chien-An ; Hsieh, Chen-Hsi ; Tien, Hui-Ju ; Lin, Chi-Ta ; Yeh, Hsin-Pei ; Wu, Le-Jung ; Huang, Hsien-Da ; Shueng, Pei-Wei</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how to perform and define appropriate action levels for the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery quality assurance (DQA) for both linear accelerator (linac) and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans using a 2D array diode detector. MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL, USA) was used to perform the DQA measurements of patient plans at various sites: brain, head and neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis, spine, bone and others. The measured and planned doses were compared using gamma analysis with a total dose discrepancy of 3% or a gradient difference of 3 mm criteria. DQAs for 507 HT and 380 linac-based IMRT plans were performed, and the mean diode percentage passing rates for 3%/3 mm criteria were 93.8% and 95.1% respectively. For HT delivery, 4.6% and 9.5% of the plans had the passing rates below 80% and 85%, while for linac-based IMRT, 7.4% of the plans had the passing rates lower than 90%. Applying confidence limit with multiplier of 1, action levels for passing rates of 87% and 90% are recommended for HT and IMRT plans respectively.
► Quality assurance was performed for 7–9 fields IMRT and helical tomotherapy plans. ► Confidence limit with multiplier of 1 was used to define the results action levels. ► For helical tomotherapy plans, the overall action level is recommended to be 87%. ► For IMRT linac plans, the recommended overall action level is 90%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-4487</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0925</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.08.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Arrays ; Bones ; Criteria ; Detectors ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Geochronology ; Heat treatment ; Helical ; Helical Tomotherapy ; Intensity modulated radiation therapy ; Isotope geochemistry. Geochronology ; Linear accelerator ; Linear accelerators ; MapCHECK ; Patients ; Quality assurance</subject><ispartof>Radiation measurements, 2011-12, Vol.46 (12), p.1993-1995</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-7662c9f62ac5c9d3e93fc393355834dd21d7c14ac68fc3bafa3b3bf623ef57dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-7662c9f62ac5c9d3e93fc393355834dd21d7c14ac68fc3bafa3b3bf623ef57dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.08.004$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3548,23928,23929,25138,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25377212$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chong, Ngot Swan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jason J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kung, Wei-Hsiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chien-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, Chen-Hsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tien, Hui-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chi-Ta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeh, Hsin-Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Le-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Hsien-Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shueng, Pei-Wei</creatorcontrib><title>Patient delivery quality assurance for linac-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy using solid state detectors</title><title>Radiation measurements</title><description>The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how to perform and define appropriate action levels for the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery quality assurance (DQA) for both linear accelerator (linac) and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans using a 2D array diode detector. MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL, USA) was used to perform the DQA measurements of patient plans at various sites: brain, head and neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis, spine, bone and others. The measured and planned doses were compared using gamma analysis with a total dose discrepancy of 3% or a gradient difference of 3 mm criteria. DQAs for 507 HT and 380 linac-based IMRT plans were performed, and the mean diode percentage passing rates for 3%/3 mm criteria were 93.8% and 95.1% respectively. For HT delivery, 4.6% and 9.5% of the plans had the passing rates below 80% and 85%, while for linac-based IMRT, 7.4% of the plans had the passing rates lower than 90%. Applying confidence limit with multiplier of 1, action levels for passing rates of 87% and 90% are recommended for HT and IMRT plans respectively.
► Quality assurance was performed for 7–9 fields IMRT and helical tomotherapy plans. ► Confidence limit with multiplier of 1 was used to define the results action levels. ► For helical tomotherapy plans, the overall action level is recommended to be 87%. ► For IMRT linac plans, the recommended overall action level is 90%.</description><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Bones</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Detectors</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Geochronology</subject><subject>Heat treatment</subject><subject>Helical</subject><subject>Helical Tomotherapy</subject><subject>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</subject><subject>Isotope geochemistry. Geochronology</subject><subject>Linear accelerator</subject><subject>Linear accelerators</subject><subject>MapCHECK</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Quality assurance</subject><issn>1350-4487</issn><issn>1879-0925</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1r3DAQhk1poWnan1DQpdCLXX1a9qmU0I9AQkpJz2JWGjfaeq2NRg7sv6-WXXrNSYN43hl43qZ5L3gnuOg_bbsMYYdAneRCdHzoONcvmgsx2LHlozQv66wMb7Ue7OvmDdGWV2LszUXz9yeUiEthAef4hPnAHleYYzkwIFozLB7ZlDKb4wK-3QBhYNe3v-4ZLIE91IyHmZW0S-UBM-wPbKW4_GGU5hgYFShYNxf0JWV627yaYCZ8d34vm9_fvt5f_Whv7r5fX325ab3mprS276Ufp16CN34MCkc1eTUqZcygdAhSBOuFBt8P9X8DE6iN2lRe4WRsCOqy-Xjau8_pcUUqbhfJ4zzDgmklJ6zWVvTWmudRLvgwcCt1Rc0J9TkRZZzcPscd5EOFjlzvtu7cgzv24PjgquWa-3A-AVRlTUenkf6HpVHWSiEr9_nEYVXzFDE78rUZjyHm6s-FFJ-59A99_qJw</recordid><startdate>20111201</startdate><enddate>20111201</enddate><creator>Chong, Ngot Swan</creator><creator>Lee, Jason J.S.</creator><creator>Kung, Wei-Hsiang</creator><creator>Chen, Chien-An</creator><creator>Hsieh, Chen-Hsi</creator><creator>Tien, Hui-Ju</creator><creator>Lin, Chi-Ta</creator><creator>Yeh, Hsin-Pei</creator><creator>Wu, Le-Jung</creator><creator>Huang, Hsien-Da</creator><creator>Shueng, Pei-Wei</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20111201</creationdate><title>Patient delivery quality assurance for linac-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy using solid state detectors</title><author>Chong, Ngot Swan ; Lee, Jason J.S. ; Kung, Wei-Hsiang ; Chen, Chien-An ; Hsieh, Chen-Hsi ; Tien, Hui-Ju ; Lin, Chi-Ta ; Yeh, Hsin-Pei ; Wu, Le-Jung ; Huang, Hsien-Da ; Shueng, Pei-Wei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-7662c9f62ac5c9d3e93fc393355834dd21d7c14ac68fc3bafa3b3bf623ef57dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Bones</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Detectors</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Geochronology</topic><topic>Heat treatment</topic><topic>Helical</topic><topic>Helical Tomotherapy</topic><topic>Intensity modulated radiation therapy</topic><topic>Isotope geochemistry. Geochronology</topic><topic>Linear accelerator</topic><topic>Linear accelerators</topic><topic>MapCHECK</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Quality assurance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chong, Ngot Swan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jason J.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kung, Wei-Hsiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chien-An</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsieh, Chen-Hsi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tien, Hui-Ju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chi-Ta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeh, Hsin-Pei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Le-Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Hsien-Da</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shueng, Pei-Wei</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Radiation measurements</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chong, Ngot Swan</au><au>Lee, Jason J.S.</au><au>Kung, Wei-Hsiang</au><au>Chen, Chien-An</au><au>Hsieh, Chen-Hsi</au><au>Tien, Hui-Ju</au><au>Lin, Chi-Ta</au><au>Yeh, Hsin-Pei</au><au>Wu, Le-Jung</au><au>Huang, Hsien-Da</au><au>Shueng, Pei-Wei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient delivery quality assurance for linac-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy using solid state detectors</atitle><jtitle>Radiation measurements</jtitle><date>2011-12-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1993</spage><epage>1995</epage><pages>1993-1995</pages><issn>1350-4487</issn><eissn>1879-0925</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how to perform and define appropriate action levels for the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) delivery quality assurance (DQA) for both linear accelerator (linac) and helical tomotherapy (HT) plans using a 2D array diode detector. MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL, USA) was used to perform the DQA measurements of patient plans at various sites: brain, head and neck, chest, abdomen, pelvis, spine, bone and others. The measured and planned doses were compared using gamma analysis with a total dose discrepancy of 3% or a gradient difference of 3 mm criteria. DQAs for 507 HT and 380 linac-based IMRT plans were performed, and the mean diode percentage passing rates for 3%/3 mm criteria were 93.8% and 95.1% respectively. For HT delivery, 4.6% and 9.5% of the plans had the passing rates below 80% and 85%, while for linac-based IMRT, 7.4% of the plans had the passing rates lower than 90%. Applying confidence limit with multiplier of 1, action levels for passing rates of 87% and 90% are recommended for HT and IMRT plans respectively.
► Quality assurance was performed for 7–9 fields IMRT and helical tomotherapy plans. ► Confidence limit with multiplier of 1 was used to define the results action levels. ► For helical tomotherapy plans, the overall action level is recommended to be 87%. ► For IMRT linac plans, the recommended overall action level is 90%.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.08.004</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1350-4487 |
ispartof | Radiation measurements, 2011-12, Vol.46 (12), p.1993-1995 |
issn | 1350-4487 1879-0925 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1744716775 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Arrays Bones Criteria Detectors Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology Geochronology Heat treatment Helical Helical Tomotherapy Intensity modulated radiation therapy Isotope geochemistry. Geochronology Linear accelerator Linear accelerators MapCHECK Patients Quality assurance |
title | Patient delivery quality assurance for linac-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy using solid state detectors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A32%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20delivery%20quality%20assurance%20for%20linac-based%20IMRT%20and%20helical%20tomotherapy%20using%20solid%20state%20detectors&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20measurements&rft.au=Chong,%20Ngot%20Swan&rft.date=2011-12-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1993&rft.epage=1995&rft.pages=1993-1995&rft.issn=1350-4487&rft.eissn=1879-0925&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.08.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1010880724%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1010880724&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1350448711003878&rfr_iscdi=true |