Nest temperature, incubation period, and investment decisions of incubating wood ducks Aix sponsa

Incubating birds must balance their energetic demands with the time needed to provide care to developing embryos. Reduced care by incubating parents can result in longer incubation periods that increase predation risk and potentially influence neonate phenotype. We measured nest temperature, incubat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of avian biology 2005-11, Vol.36 (6), p.523-530
Hauptverfasser: R. Hepp, Gary, Hayes Folk, Travis, A. Manlove, Chad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Incubating birds must balance their energetic demands with the time needed to provide care to developing embryos. Reduced care by incubating parents can result in longer incubation periods that increase predation risk and potentially influence neonate phenotype. We measured nest temperature, incubation period, and body mass dynamics of female wood ducks Aix sponsa, and used an information-theoretic approach to investigate effects of several explanatory variables on incubation period and thermal characteristics of nests. A model that included clutch size and standard deviation of nest temperature best explained the variation in incubation period. Parameter estimates indicated that incubation period increased with increases in clutch size and standard deviation of nest temperature. Next, we examined relationships between maternal effects and the standard deviation of the nest temperature. The best fitting model included initiation date of incubation. There was little support for including early incubation body mass of females, incubation constancy, and percent change in female body mass in the model. The parameter estimate showed that standard deviation of nest temperature declined as initiation date of incubation advanced. Female body mass at the start of incubation was not related to structural size suggesting that heavy females were in better physical condition than were light females. Heavy females nested earlier and lost more body mass during incubation than light females, but heavy females did not reduce variation in nest temperature to decrease the incubation period. The fact that early nesting females in good physical condition did not shorten incubation periods by keeping nest temperatures less variable could have been due to either energetic limitations or restraints. Experimental manipulations of incubation costs will be needed to distinguish between these hypotheses.
ISSN:0908-8857
1600-048X
DOI:10.1111/j.0908-8857.2005.03462.x