Use of Cotinine Immunoassay Test Strips for Preclassifying Urine Samples from Smokers and Nonsmokers Prior to Analysis by LC-MS-MS

Cotinine biomarker measurements involving both smokers and nonsmokers must accommodate a broad range of concentrations. Thus, we have routinely preclassified unknown samples as being either “high” or “low” by using an enzyme-linked immunoassay for cotinine prior to analysis by tandem mass spectromet...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of analytical toxicology 2005-11, Vol.29 (8), p.814-818
Hauptverfasser: Bernert, John T., Harmon, Tia L., Sosnoff, Connie S., McGuffey, James E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 818
container_issue 8
container_start_page 814
container_title Journal of analytical toxicology
container_volume 29
creator Bernert, John T.
Harmon, Tia L.
Sosnoff, Connie S.
McGuffey, James E.
description Cotinine biomarker measurements involving both smokers and nonsmokers must accommodate a broad range of concentrations. Thus, we have routinely preclassified unknown samples as being either “high” or “low” by using an enzyme-linked immunoassay for cotinine prior to analysis by tandem mass spectrometry (MS). Although this method is effective, it is also time-consuming and complex; a simpler and faster approach would be useful. Consequently, a screening assay for urine cotinine using an immunochromatographic test strip (NicAlert™) followed by a computerized analysis of the data was examined as a possible alternative. The results indicate that this approach can provide useful classification efficiency when using our target cutoff value of approximately 20 ng/mL. In the analysis of 50 urine samples from nonsmokers with varying degrees of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, the classification sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 92%, respectively, for cotinine measured by the test strips relative to total cotinine concentrations measured by atmospheric-pressure ionization tandem MS. However, the relatively high cost of the strips may be a limiting factor.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jat/29.8.814
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17434524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jat/29.8.814</oup_id><sourcerecordid>17434524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-378228dbc5502ad497562024a4ac83d61a319870919f57930446311977323d863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEuLFDEUhYMo2I7u_AHZqBurJ6_KYzn2OA9pdaS7QdyETFVKMlOV1ORWg7X1l5uhG10KFy6X-50D5yD0mpIlJYaf3rnplJmlXmoqnqAFNaKumCD8KVoQKmQllCTP0QuAO0Ko1JIv0O8deJw6vEpTiCF6fD0M-5gcgJvx1sOEN1MOI-AuZXyTfdOXV-jmEH_iXX4UbNww9r4AOQ14M6R7nwG72OIvKcLxvMmhyKeEz6LrZwiAb2e8XlWfN2Veomed68G_Ou4TtLv4uF1dVeuvl9ers3XVCCKmiivNmG5vm7omzLXCqFoywoQTrtG8ldRxarQihpquVoYTISSn1CjFGW9L2BP09uA75vSwL9HsEKDxfe-iT3uwVAkuaiYK-P4ANjkBZN_ZMYfB5dlSYh-LtqVoy4zVthRd8DdHXweN67vsYhPgn0YxQ4zUhXt34NJ-_J9jdSADTP7XX9bleysVV7W9-v7D0suLD-efzrf2G_8DWH6Y6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17434524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Cotinine Immunoassay Test Strips for Preclassifying Urine Samples from Smokers and Nonsmokers Prior to Analysis by LC-MS-MS</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bernert, John T. ; Harmon, Tia L. ; Sosnoff, Connie S. ; McGuffey, James E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernert, John T. ; Harmon, Tia L. ; Sosnoff, Connie S. ; McGuffey, James E.</creatorcontrib><description>Cotinine biomarker measurements involving both smokers and nonsmokers must accommodate a broad range of concentrations. Thus, we have routinely preclassified unknown samples as being either “high” or “low” by using an enzyme-linked immunoassay for cotinine prior to analysis by tandem mass spectrometry (MS). Although this method is effective, it is also time-consuming and complex; a simpler and faster approach would be useful. Consequently, a screening assay for urine cotinine using an immunochromatographic test strip (NicAlert™) followed by a computerized analysis of the data was examined as a possible alternative. The results indicate that this approach can provide useful classification efficiency when using our target cutoff value of approximately 20 ng/mL. In the analysis of 50 urine samples from nonsmokers with varying degrees of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, the classification sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 92%, respectively, for cotinine measured by the test strips relative to total cotinine concentrations measured by atmospheric-pressure ionization tandem MS. However, the relatively high cost of the strips may be a limiting factor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-4760</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-2403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jat/29.8.814</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JATOD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Niles, IL: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Medical sciences ; Tobacco, tobacco smoking ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Journal of analytical toxicology, 2005-11, Vol.29 (8), p.814-818</ispartof><rights>2005</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-378228dbc5502ad497562024a4ac83d61a319870919f57930446311977323d863</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17290968$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernert, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmon, Tia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sosnoff, Connie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuffey, James E.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Cotinine Immunoassay Test Strips for Preclassifying Urine Samples from Smokers and Nonsmokers Prior to Analysis by LC-MS-MS</title><title>Journal of analytical toxicology</title><addtitle>Journal of Analytical Toxicology</addtitle><addtitle>Journal of Analytical Toxicology</addtitle><description>Cotinine biomarker measurements involving both smokers and nonsmokers must accommodate a broad range of concentrations. Thus, we have routinely preclassified unknown samples as being either “high” or “low” by using an enzyme-linked immunoassay for cotinine prior to analysis by tandem mass spectrometry (MS). Although this method is effective, it is also time-consuming and complex; a simpler and faster approach would be useful. Consequently, a screening assay for urine cotinine using an immunochromatographic test strip (NicAlert™) followed by a computerized analysis of the data was examined as a possible alternative. The results indicate that this approach can provide useful classification efficiency when using our target cutoff value of approximately 20 ng/mL. In the analysis of 50 urine samples from nonsmokers with varying degrees of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, the classification sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 92%, respectively, for cotinine measured by the test strips relative to total cotinine concentrations measured by atmospheric-pressure ionization tandem MS. However, the relatively high cost of the strips may be a limiting factor.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0146-4760</issn><issn>1945-2403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEuLFDEUhYMo2I7u_AHZqBurJ6_KYzn2OA9pdaS7QdyETFVKMlOV1ORWg7X1l5uhG10KFy6X-50D5yD0mpIlJYaf3rnplJmlXmoqnqAFNaKumCD8KVoQKmQllCTP0QuAO0Ko1JIv0O8deJw6vEpTiCF6fD0M-5gcgJvx1sOEN1MOI-AuZXyTfdOXV-jmEH_iXX4UbNww9r4AOQ14M6R7nwG72OIvKcLxvMmhyKeEz6LrZwiAb2e8XlWfN2Veomed68G_Ou4TtLv4uF1dVeuvl9ers3XVCCKmiivNmG5vm7omzLXCqFoywoQTrtG8ldRxarQihpquVoYTISSn1CjFGW9L2BP09uA75vSwL9HsEKDxfe-iT3uwVAkuaiYK-P4ANjkBZN_ZMYfB5dlSYh-LtqVoy4zVthRd8DdHXweN67vsYhPgn0YxQ4zUhXt34NJ-_J9jdSADTP7XX9bleysVV7W9-v7D0suLD-efzrf2G_8DWH6Y6w</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Bernert, John T.</creator><creator>Harmon, Tia L.</creator><creator>Sosnoff, Connie S.</creator><creator>McGuffey, James E.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Preston</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>Use of Cotinine Immunoassay Test Strips for Preclassifying Urine Samples from Smokers and Nonsmokers Prior to Analysis by LC-MS-MS</title><author>Bernert, John T. ; Harmon, Tia L. ; Sosnoff, Connie S. ; McGuffey, James E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-378228dbc5502ad497562024a4ac83d61a319870919f57930446311977323d863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernert, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmon, Tia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sosnoff, Connie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuffey, James E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of analytical toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernert, John T.</au><au>Harmon, Tia L.</au><au>Sosnoff, Connie S.</au><au>McGuffey, James E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Cotinine Immunoassay Test Strips for Preclassifying Urine Samples from Smokers and Nonsmokers Prior to Analysis by LC-MS-MS</atitle><jtitle>Journal of analytical toxicology</jtitle><stitle>Journal of Analytical Toxicology</stitle><addtitle>Journal of Analytical Toxicology</addtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>814</spage><epage>818</epage><pages>814-818</pages><issn>0146-4760</issn><eissn>1945-2403</eissn><coden>JATOD3</coden><abstract>Cotinine biomarker measurements involving both smokers and nonsmokers must accommodate a broad range of concentrations. Thus, we have routinely preclassified unknown samples as being either “high” or “low” by using an enzyme-linked immunoassay for cotinine prior to analysis by tandem mass spectrometry (MS). Although this method is effective, it is also time-consuming and complex; a simpler and faster approach would be useful. Consequently, a screening assay for urine cotinine using an immunochromatographic test strip (NicAlert™) followed by a computerized analysis of the data was examined as a possible alternative. The results indicate that this approach can provide useful classification efficiency when using our target cutoff value of approximately 20 ng/mL. In the analysis of 50 urine samples from nonsmokers with varying degrees of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, the classification sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 92%, respectively, for cotinine measured by the test strips relative to total cotinine concentrations measured by atmospheric-pressure ionization tandem MS. However, the relatively high cost of the strips may be a limiting factor.</abstract><cop>Niles, IL</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jat/29.8.814</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-4760
ispartof Journal of analytical toxicology, 2005-11, Vol.29 (8), p.814-818
issn 0146-4760
1945-2403
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17434524
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Biological and medical sciences
Medical sciences
Tobacco, tobacco smoking
Toxicology
title Use of Cotinine Immunoassay Test Strips for Preclassifying Urine Samples from Smokers and Nonsmokers Prior to Analysis by LC-MS-MS
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T18%3A58%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Cotinine%20Immunoassay%20Test%20Strips%20for%20Preclassifying%20Urine%20Samples%20from%20Smokers%20and%20Nonsmokers%20Prior%20to%20Analysis%20by%20LC-MS-MS&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20analytical%20toxicology&rft.au=Bernert,%20John%20T.&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=814&rft.epage=818&rft.pages=814-818&rft.issn=0146-4760&rft.eissn=1945-2403&rft.coden=JATOD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jat/29.8.814&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17434524%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17434524&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jat/29.8.814&rfr_iscdi=true