Use of Cotinine Immunoassay Test Strips for Preclassifying Urine Samples from Smokers and Nonsmokers Prior to Analysis by LC-MS-MS
Cotinine biomarker measurements involving both smokers and nonsmokers must accommodate a broad range of concentrations. Thus, we have routinely preclassified unknown samples as being either “high” or “low” by using an enzyme-linked immunoassay for cotinine prior to analysis by tandem mass spectromet...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of analytical toxicology 2005-11, Vol.29 (8), p.814-818 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 818 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 814 |
container_title | Journal of analytical toxicology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Bernert, John T. Harmon, Tia L. Sosnoff, Connie S. McGuffey, James E. |
description | Cotinine biomarker measurements involving both smokers and nonsmokers must accommodate a broad range of concentrations. Thus, we have routinely preclassified unknown samples as being either “high” or “low” by using an enzyme-linked immunoassay for cotinine prior to analysis by tandem mass spectrometry (MS). Although this method is effective, it is also time-consuming and complex; a simpler and faster approach would be useful. Consequently, a screening assay for urine cotinine using an immunochromatographic test strip (NicAlert™) followed by a computerized analysis of the data was examined as a possible alternative. The results indicate that this approach can provide useful classification efficiency when using our target cutoff value of approximately 20 ng/mL. In the analysis of 50 urine samples from nonsmokers with varying degrees of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, the classification sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 92%, respectively, for cotinine measured by the test strips relative to total cotinine concentrations measured by atmospheric-pressure ionization tandem MS. However, the relatively high cost of the strips may be a limiting factor. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jat/29.8.814 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17434524</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jat/29.8.814</oup_id><sourcerecordid>17434524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-378228dbc5502ad497562024a4ac83d61a319870919f57930446311977323d863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEuLFDEUhYMo2I7u_AHZqBurJ6_KYzn2OA9pdaS7QdyETFVKMlOV1ORWg7X1l5uhG10KFy6X-50D5yD0mpIlJYaf3rnplJmlXmoqnqAFNaKumCD8KVoQKmQllCTP0QuAO0Ko1JIv0O8deJw6vEpTiCF6fD0M-5gcgJvx1sOEN1MOI-AuZXyTfdOXV-jmEH_iXX4UbNww9r4AOQ14M6R7nwG72OIvKcLxvMmhyKeEz6LrZwiAb2e8XlWfN2Veomed68G_Ou4TtLv4uF1dVeuvl9ers3XVCCKmiivNmG5vm7omzLXCqFoywoQTrtG8ldRxarQihpquVoYTISSn1CjFGW9L2BP09uA75vSwL9HsEKDxfe-iT3uwVAkuaiYK-P4ANjkBZN_ZMYfB5dlSYh-LtqVoy4zVthRd8DdHXweN67vsYhPgn0YxQ4zUhXt34NJ-_J9jdSADTP7XX9bleysVV7W9-v7D0suLD-efzrf2G_8DWH6Y6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17434524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of Cotinine Immunoassay Test Strips for Preclassifying Urine Samples from Smokers and Nonsmokers Prior to Analysis by LC-MS-MS</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bernert, John T. ; Harmon, Tia L. ; Sosnoff, Connie S. ; McGuffey, James E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bernert, John T. ; Harmon, Tia L. ; Sosnoff, Connie S. ; McGuffey, James E.</creatorcontrib><description>Cotinine biomarker measurements involving both smokers and nonsmokers must accommodate a broad range of concentrations. Thus, we have routinely preclassified unknown samples as being either “high” or “low” by using an enzyme-linked immunoassay for cotinine prior to analysis by tandem mass spectrometry (MS). Although this method is effective, it is also time-consuming and complex; a simpler and faster approach would be useful. Consequently, a screening assay for urine cotinine using an immunochromatographic test strip (NicAlert™) followed by a computerized analysis of the data was examined as a possible alternative. The results indicate that this approach can provide useful classification efficiency when using our target cutoff value of approximately 20 ng/mL. In the analysis of 50 urine samples from nonsmokers with varying degrees of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, the classification sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 92%, respectively, for cotinine measured by the test strips relative to total cotinine concentrations measured by atmospheric-pressure ionization tandem MS. However, the relatively high cost of the strips may be a limiting factor.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-4760</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-2403</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jat/29.8.814</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JATOD3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Niles, IL: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Medical sciences ; Tobacco, tobacco smoking ; Toxicology</subject><ispartof>Journal of analytical toxicology, 2005-11, Vol.29 (8), p.814-818</ispartof><rights>2005</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-378228dbc5502ad497562024a4ac83d61a319870919f57930446311977323d863</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17290968$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bernert, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmon, Tia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sosnoff, Connie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuffey, James E.</creatorcontrib><title>Use of Cotinine Immunoassay Test Strips for Preclassifying Urine Samples from Smokers and Nonsmokers Prior to Analysis by LC-MS-MS</title><title>Journal of analytical toxicology</title><addtitle>Journal of Analytical Toxicology</addtitle><addtitle>Journal of Analytical Toxicology</addtitle><description>Cotinine biomarker measurements involving both smokers and nonsmokers must accommodate a broad range of concentrations. Thus, we have routinely preclassified unknown samples as being either “high” or “low” by using an enzyme-linked immunoassay for cotinine prior to analysis by tandem mass spectrometry (MS). Although this method is effective, it is also time-consuming and complex; a simpler and faster approach would be useful. Consequently, a screening assay for urine cotinine using an immunochromatographic test strip (NicAlert™) followed by a computerized analysis of the data was examined as a possible alternative. The results indicate that this approach can provide useful classification efficiency when using our target cutoff value of approximately 20 ng/mL. In the analysis of 50 urine samples from nonsmokers with varying degrees of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, the classification sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 92%, respectively, for cotinine measured by the test strips relative to total cotinine concentrations measured by atmospheric-pressure ionization tandem MS. However, the relatively high cost of the strips may be a limiting factor.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><issn>0146-4760</issn><issn>1945-2403</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEuLFDEUhYMo2I7u_AHZqBurJ6_KYzn2OA9pdaS7QdyETFVKMlOV1ORWg7X1l5uhG10KFy6X-50D5yD0mpIlJYaf3rnplJmlXmoqnqAFNaKumCD8KVoQKmQllCTP0QuAO0Ko1JIv0O8deJw6vEpTiCF6fD0M-5gcgJvx1sOEN1MOI-AuZXyTfdOXV-jmEH_iXX4UbNww9r4AOQ14M6R7nwG72OIvKcLxvMmhyKeEz6LrZwiAb2e8XlWfN2Veomed68G_Ou4TtLv4uF1dVeuvl9ers3XVCCKmiivNmG5vm7omzLXCqFoywoQTrtG8ldRxarQihpquVoYTISSn1CjFGW9L2BP09uA75vSwL9HsEKDxfe-iT3uwVAkuaiYK-P4ANjkBZN_ZMYfB5dlSYh-LtqVoy4zVthRd8DdHXweN67vsYhPgn0YxQ4zUhXt34NJ-_J9jdSADTP7XX9bleysVV7W9-v7D0suLD-efzrf2G_8DWH6Y6w</recordid><startdate>20051101</startdate><enddate>20051101</enddate><creator>Bernert, John T.</creator><creator>Harmon, Tia L.</creator><creator>Sosnoff, Connie S.</creator><creator>McGuffey, James E.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Preston</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051101</creationdate><title>Use of Cotinine Immunoassay Test Strips for Preclassifying Urine Samples from Smokers and Nonsmokers Prior to Analysis by LC-MS-MS</title><author>Bernert, John T. ; Harmon, Tia L. ; Sosnoff, Connie S. ; McGuffey, James E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c404t-378228dbc5502ad497562024a4ac83d61a319870919f57930446311977323d863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Tobacco, tobacco smoking</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bernert, John T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmon, Tia L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sosnoff, Connie S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGuffey, James E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of analytical toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bernert, John T.</au><au>Harmon, Tia L.</au><au>Sosnoff, Connie S.</au><au>McGuffey, James E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of Cotinine Immunoassay Test Strips for Preclassifying Urine Samples from Smokers and Nonsmokers Prior to Analysis by LC-MS-MS</atitle><jtitle>Journal of analytical toxicology</jtitle><stitle>Journal of Analytical Toxicology</stitle><addtitle>Journal of Analytical Toxicology</addtitle><date>2005-11-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>814</spage><epage>818</epage><pages>814-818</pages><issn>0146-4760</issn><eissn>1945-2403</eissn><coden>JATOD3</coden><abstract>Cotinine biomarker measurements involving both smokers and nonsmokers must accommodate a broad range of concentrations. Thus, we have routinely preclassified unknown samples as being either “high” or “low” by using an enzyme-linked immunoassay for cotinine prior to analysis by tandem mass spectrometry (MS). Although this method is effective, it is also time-consuming and complex; a simpler and faster approach would be useful. Consequently, a screening assay for urine cotinine using an immunochromatographic test strip (NicAlert™) followed by a computerized analysis of the data was examined as a possible alternative. The results indicate that this approach can provide useful classification efficiency when using our target cutoff value of approximately 20 ng/mL. In the analysis of 50 urine samples from nonsmokers with varying degrees of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, the classification sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 92%, respectively, for cotinine measured by the test strips relative to total cotinine concentrations measured by atmospheric-pressure ionization tandem MS. However, the relatively high cost of the strips may be a limiting factor.</abstract><cop>Niles, IL</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jat/29.8.814</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0146-4760 |
ispartof | Journal of analytical toxicology, 2005-11, Vol.29 (8), p.814-818 |
issn | 0146-4760 1945-2403 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17434524 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Medical sciences Tobacco, tobacco smoking Toxicology |
title | Use of Cotinine Immunoassay Test Strips for Preclassifying Urine Samples from Smokers and Nonsmokers Prior to Analysis by LC-MS-MS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T18%3A58%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20Cotinine%20Immunoassay%20Test%20Strips%20for%20Preclassifying%20Urine%20Samples%20from%20Smokers%20and%20Nonsmokers%20Prior%20to%20Analysis%20by%20LC-MS-MS&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20analytical%20toxicology&rft.au=Bernert,%20John%20T.&rft.date=2005-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=814&rft.epage=818&rft.pages=814-818&rft.issn=0146-4760&rft.eissn=1945-2403&rft.coden=JATOD3&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jat/29.8.814&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17434524%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17434524&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jat/29.8.814&rfr_iscdi=true |