Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?

•Study examines three types of FFCF: direct and metalinguistic; metalinguistic only; no feedback.•Reports FFCF effects on grammatical (rule-based) errors and non-grammatical (lexical) errors.•Direct and metalinguistic group had fewer pronoun errors on immediate posttest.•Direct and metalinguistic gr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Assessing writing 2015-04, Vol.24 (Apr), p.16-34
1. Verfasser: Mawlawi Diab, Nuwar
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue Apr
container_start_page 16
container_title Assessing writing
container_volume 24
creator Mawlawi Diab, Nuwar
description •Study examines three types of FFCF: direct and metalinguistic; metalinguistic only; no feedback.•Reports FFCF effects on grammatical (rule-based) errors and non-grammatical (lexical) errors.•Direct and metalinguistic group had fewer pronoun errors on immediate posttest.•Direct and metalinguistic group had fewer lexical errors on delayed post-test.•Interviews with five students provided additional insights. The study examines the effect of form-focused corrective feedback (FFCF) on students’ ability to reduce pronoun agreement errors and lexical errors in new essays. Two experimental groups received on three assignments: direct error correction along with metalinguistic feedback, and only metalinguistic feedback, respectively; while the control group self edited their errors. All groups revised their errors before the next assignment. Students took pretest, immediate and delayed post-tests, and the two experimental groups were interviewed about the FFCF received. Results of the immediate post-test revealed a significant difference in pronoun agreement errors of the direct metalinguistic group; no significant difference appeared in lexical errors. At the delayed post-test, there was no significant difference among the groups in pronoun agreement errors, but a significant difference appeared in lexical errors of the direct metalinguistic group. Theoretical explanation and pedagogical implications are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1738472217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1075293515000021</els_id><sourcerecordid>1738472217</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-a8c39d70cc43d0cb8b1d55f03372e47ce68215264c05d01cdcc8097f81e9aff03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ULtOAzEQtBBIhMAH0LmkucOPe0KBEISHFIkGastZryWH5BzsS6L8PT4dUFLNandmtDOEXHKWc8ar62Wu4z4XjJc5Ezlj_IhMeFPLrGx5dZxmVpeZaGV5Ss5iXCZCwaScEDWzFqF3O-wwRuot3QfX99hR8CGMF2oRzULD5w199Bhpf9jgwMQQfKC6M3-bX43v6Fonl3B3Tk6sXkW8-MEp-XiavT-8ZPO359eH-3kGUrI-0w3I1tQMoJCGwaJZcFOWNr1YCyxqwKoRvBRVAaw0jIMBaFhb24Zjq23iTcnV6LsJ_muLsVdrFwFXK92h30bFa9kUtRAJp4SPVAg-xoBWbYJb63BQnKmhTLVUqUw1lKmYUKmrpLkdNZgy7BwGFcFhB2jcEFgZ7_5RfwNC3n2i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1738472217</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mawlawi Diab, Nuwar</creator><creatorcontrib>Mawlawi Diab, Nuwar</creatorcontrib><description>•Study examines three types of FFCF: direct and metalinguistic; metalinguistic only; no feedback.•Reports FFCF effects on grammatical (rule-based) errors and non-grammatical (lexical) errors.•Direct and metalinguistic group had fewer pronoun errors on immediate posttest.•Direct and metalinguistic group had fewer lexical errors on delayed post-test.•Interviews with five students provided additional insights. The study examines the effect of form-focused corrective feedback (FFCF) on students’ ability to reduce pronoun agreement errors and lexical errors in new essays. Two experimental groups received on three assignments: direct error correction along with metalinguistic feedback, and only metalinguistic feedback, respectively; while the control group self edited their errors. All groups revised their errors before the next assignment. Students took pretest, immediate and delayed post-tests, and the two experimental groups were interviewed about the FFCF received. Results of the immediate post-test revealed a significant difference in pronoun agreement errors of the direct metalinguistic group; no significant difference appeared in lexical errors. At the delayed post-test, there was no significant difference among the groups in pronoun agreement errors, but a significant difference appeared in lexical errors of the direct metalinguistic group. Theoretical explanation and pedagogical implications are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1075-2935</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5916</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ASWRFM</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Declarative knowledge ; Error revision ; Form-focused corrective feedback ; Language acquisition ; Procedural knowledge</subject><ispartof>Assessing writing, 2015-04, Vol.24 (Apr), p.16-34</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-a8c39d70cc43d0cb8b1d55f03372e47ce68215264c05d01cdcc8097f81e9aff03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-a8c39d70cc43d0cb8b1d55f03372e47ce68215264c05d01cdcc8097f81e9aff03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293515000021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mawlawi Diab, Nuwar</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?</title><title>Assessing writing</title><description>•Study examines three types of FFCF: direct and metalinguistic; metalinguistic only; no feedback.•Reports FFCF effects on grammatical (rule-based) errors and non-grammatical (lexical) errors.•Direct and metalinguistic group had fewer pronoun errors on immediate posttest.•Direct and metalinguistic group had fewer lexical errors on delayed post-test.•Interviews with five students provided additional insights. The study examines the effect of form-focused corrective feedback (FFCF) on students’ ability to reduce pronoun agreement errors and lexical errors in new essays. Two experimental groups received on three assignments: direct error correction along with metalinguistic feedback, and only metalinguistic feedback, respectively; while the control group self edited their errors. All groups revised their errors before the next assignment. Students took pretest, immediate and delayed post-tests, and the two experimental groups were interviewed about the FFCF received. Results of the immediate post-test revealed a significant difference in pronoun agreement errors of the direct metalinguistic group; no significant difference appeared in lexical errors. At the delayed post-test, there was no significant difference among the groups in pronoun agreement errors, but a significant difference appeared in lexical errors of the direct metalinguistic group. Theoretical explanation and pedagogical implications are discussed.</description><subject>Declarative knowledge</subject><subject>Error revision</subject><subject>Form-focused corrective feedback</subject><subject>Language acquisition</subject><subject>Procedural knowledge</subject><issn>1075-2935</issn><issn>1873-5916</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ULtOAzEQtBBIhMAH0LmkucOPe0KBEISHFIkGastZryWH5BzsS6L8PT4dUFLNandmtDOEXHKWc8ar62Wu4z4XjJc5Ezlj_IhMeFPLrGx5dZxmVpeZaGV5Ss5iXCZCwaScEDWzFqF3O-wwRuot3QfX99hR8CGMF2oRzULD5w199Bhpf9jgwMQQfKC6M3-bX43v6Fonl3B3Tk6sXkW8-MEp-XiavT-8ZPO359eH-3kGUrI-0w3I1tQMoJCGwaJZcFOWNr1YCyxqwKoRvBRVAaw0jIMBaFhb24Zjq23iTcnV6LsJ_muLsVdrFwFXK92h30bFa9kUtRAJp4SPVAg-xoBWbYJb63BQnKmhTLVUqUw1lKmYUKmrpLkdNZgy7BwGFcFhB2jcEFgZ7_5RfwNC3n2i</recordid><startdate>201504</startdate><enddate>201504</enddate><creator>Mawlawi Diab, Nuwar</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201504</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?</title><author>Mawlawi Diab, Nuwar</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-a8c39d70cc43d0cb8b1d55f03372e47ce68215264c05d01cdcc8097f81e9aff03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Declarative knowledge</topic><topic>Error revision</topic><topic>Form-focused corrective feedback</topic><topic>Language acquisition</topic><topic>Procedural knowledge</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mawlawi Diab, Nuwar</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Assessing writing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mawlawi Diab, Nuwar</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?</atitle><jtitle>Assessing writing</jtitle><date>2015-04</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>Apr</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>16-34</pages><issn>1075-2935</issn><eissn>1873-5916</eissn><coden>ASWRFM</coden><abstract>•Study examines three types of FFCF: direct and metalinguistic; metalinguistic only; no feedback.•Reports FFCF effects on grammatical (rule-based) errors and non-grammatical (lexical) errors.•Direct and metalinguistic group had fewer pronoun errors on immediate posttest.•Direct and metalinguistic group had fewer lexical errors on delayed post-test.•Interviews with five students provided additional insights. The study examines the effect of form-focused corrective feedback (FFCF) on students’ ability to reduce pronoun agreement errors and lexical errors in new essays. Two experimental groups received on three assignments: direct error correction along with metalinguistic feedback, and only metalinguistic feedback, respectively; while the control group self edited their errors. All groups revised their errors before the next assignment. Students took pretest, immediate and delayed post-tests, and the two experimental groups were interviewed about the FFCF received. Results of the immediate post-test revealed a significant difference in pronoun agreement errors of the direct metalinguistic group; no significant difference appeared in lexical errors. At the delayed post-test, there was no significant difference among the groups in pronoun agreement errors, but a significant difference appeared in lexical errors of the direct metalinguistic group. Theoretical explanation and pedagogical implications are discussed.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1075-2935
ispartof Assessing writing, 2015-04, Vol.24 (Apr), p.16-34
issn 1075-2935
1873-5916
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1738472217
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Declarative knowledge
Error revision
Form-focused corrective feedback
Language acquisition
Procedural knowledge
title Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T00%3A32%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20written%20corrective%20feedback:%20Does%20type%20of%20error%20and%20type%20of%20correction%20matter?&rft.jtitle=Assessing%20writing&rft.au=Mawlawi%20Diab,%20Nuwar&rft.date=2015-04&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=Apr&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=16-34&rft.issn=1075-2935&rft.eissn=1873-5916&rft.coden=ASWRFM&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1738472217%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1738472217&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S1075293515000021&rfr_iscdi=true