Effectiveness of written corrective feedback: Does type of error and type of correction matter?
•Study examines three types of FFCF: direct and metalinguistic; metalinguistic only; no feedback.•Reports FFCF effects on grammatical (rule-based) errors and non-grammatical (lexical) errors.•Direct and metalinguistic group had fewer pronoun errors on immediate posttest.•Direct and metalinguistic gr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Assessing writing 2015-04, Vol.24 (Apr), p.16-34 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Study examines three types of FFCF: direct and metalinguistic; metalinguistic only; no feedback.•Reports FFCF effects on grammatical (rule-based) errors and non-grammatical (lexical) errors.•Direct and metalinguistic group had fewer pronoun errors on immediate posttest.•Direct and metalinguistic group had fewer lexical errors on delayed post-test.•Interviews with five students provided additional insights.
The study examines the effect of form-focused corrective feedback (FFCF) on students’ ability to reduce pronoun agreement errors and lexical errors in new essays. Two experimental groups received on three assignments: direct error correction along with metalinguistic feedback, and only metalinguistic feedback, respectively; while the control group self edited their errors. All groups revised their errors before the next assignment. Students took pretest, immediate and delayed post-tests, and the two experimental groups were interviewed about the FFCF received. Results of the immediate post-test revealed a significant difference in pronoun agreement errors of the direct metalinguistic group; no significant difference appeared in lexical errors. At the delayed post-test, there was no significant difference among the groups in pronoun agreement errors, but a significant difference appeared in lexical errors of the direct metalinguistic group. Theoretical explanation and pedagogical implications are discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1075-2935 1873-5916 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.asw.2015.02.001 |