Reactivity in ELISA with DNA-loaded nucleosomes in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis
•Both nucleosomes and dsDNA are nephritogenic targets in lupus nephritis. Therefore, we compared in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis the reactivity in ELISA towards dsDNA-loaded nucleosomes with the reactivity towards dsDNA or nucleosomes alone. The sensitivity of the DNA-loaded nucleosom...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Molecular immunology 2015-11, Vol.68 (1), p.20-24 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Both nucleosomes and dsDNA are nephritogenic targets in lupus nephritis. Therefore, we compared in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis the reactivity in ELISA towards dsDNA-loaded nucleosomes with the reactivity towards dsDNA or nucleosomes alone. The sensitivity of the DNA-loaded nucleosome and the nucleosome ELISA was equal (86 and 85%) and higher than the dsDNA ELISA (66%). In patients with absent (dsDNA) or low (nucleosome) reactivity, higher titers were found towards DNA-loaded nucleosomes. Therefore, DNA-loaded nucleosomes seem to provide the best antigenic platform for the evaluation of anti-chromatin antibodies in lupus nephritis.
Autoantibodies against nucleosomes are considered a hallmark of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We compared in patients with proliferative lupus nephritis the diagnostic usefulness of a dsDNA-loaded nucleosome ELISA (anti-dsDNA-NcX) with ELISAs in which dsDNA or nucleosomes alone were coated. First, we analysed whether DNA loading on nucleosomes led to masking of epitopes by using defined monoclonal anti-DNA, anti-histone and nucleosome-specific autoantibodies to evaluate the accessibility of nucleosomal epitopes in the anti-dsDNA-NcX ELISA. Second, autoantibody levels were measured in these 3 ELISAs in 100 patients with proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) before immunosuppressive treatment and in 128 non-SLE disease controls. In patients with LN inter-assay comparisons and associations with clinical and serological parameters were analysed. The panel of monoclonal antibodies revealed that all epitopes were equally accessible in the anti-dsDNA-NcX ELISA as in the two other ELISAs. Patients with proliferative lupus nephritis were positive with dsDNA-loaded nucleosomes in 86%, with DNA in 66% and with nucleosomes in 85%. In the non-lupus disease control group these frequencies were 1.6% (2 out of 128) for both the anti-dsDNA-NcX and the anti-dsDNA ELISA and 0% in the anti-nucleosome ELISA. The levels in the anti-dsDNA-NcX ELISA were high in a group of patients with LN that showed absent reactivity in the anti-DNA or low levels in the anti-nucleosome ELISA. Anti-dsDNA-NcX positivity was associated with higher SLEDAI scores within this group. Within nucleosome-based ELISAs, we propose the anti-dsDNA-NcX ELISA as the preferred test system. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0161-5890 1872-9142 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.molimm.2015.06.004 |