Management of Distal Tibial Metaphyseal Fractures With the SIGN Intramedullary Nail in 3 Developing Countries

OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the effectiveness of the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) intramedullary (IM) nail in distal tibial metaphyseal fractures. DESIGN:Retrospective Case Series. SETTING:Three Level I trauma centers in 3 different developing countries from 2009 to 2013. PATIENT/PARTICIPAN...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of orthopaedic trauma 2015-12, Vol.29 (12), p.e469-e475
Hauptverfasser: Stephens, Kyle R, Shahab, Faseeh, Galat, Daniel, Anderson, Duane, Shahabuddin, Whiting, Paul S, Lundy, Douglas W, Zirkle, Lewis G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:OBJECTIVES:To evaluate the effectiveness of the Surgical Implant Generation Network (SIGN) intramedullary (IM) nail in distal tibial metaphyseal fractures. DESIGN:Retrospective Case Series. SETTING:Three Level I trauma centers in 3 different developing countries from 2009 to 2013. PATIENT/PARTICIPANTS:One hundred sixty patients with 162 distal tibial metaphyseal fractures (AO/OTA 43-A). INTERVENTION:SIGN IM nailing was performed using hand reaming and without the use of an image intensifier. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:The primary outcome measures were the rate of union and complications. The secondary outcome measures were the effect of open fractures on outcomes, effectiveness and safety of open reduction of closed fractures, and risk factors for the development of malalignment and possible solutions. RESULTS:The average age of patients was 35.3 years. Seventy-nine percent were male. Sixty percent of the fractures were closed. The mean time to surgery was 4.1 days. Fracture union occurred in 97.3% of fractures with an average time to union of 105 days. Open reduction of closed fractures was performed in 51 fractures. Nonunion occurred in 3 patients (1.8%). Acceptable alignment (
ISSN:0890-5339
1531-2291
DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000396