Reaching Out to Overcome Political Apathy: Building Participatory Capacity through Deliberative Engagement

A common objection against deliberative democracy relates to the impression that citizens, in general, are unwilling to participate in democratic politics. We contribute to the growing literature that challenges this impression by analyzing the discursive profile of citizens that participate in deli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Politics & policy (Statesboro, Ga.) Ga.), 2013-06, Vol.41 (3), p.355-383
Hauptverfasser: Curato, Nicole, Niemeyer, Simon
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A common objection against deliberative democracy relates to the impression that citizens, in general, are unwilling to participate in democratic politics. We contribute to the growing literature that challenges this impression by analyzing the discursive profile of citizens that participate in deliberation. By discursive profile, we refer to participants' own perceived role in the democratic process and their articulated motivations for joining a deliberative forum. We find that those who turned up in face‐to‐face deliberation tend to be less cynical toward politics. Moreover, based on their expressed motivations for participating, it can be inferred that linking the deliberative forum to decision makers provided an initial hook to participants. However, this changed as participants completed the process. At the end of deliberations, appreciation for the process itself ended up being the most resonant sentiment. These findings are based on both quantitative and qualitative analyses of data gathered from Australia's First Citizens' Parliament. Related Articles McBeth, Mark K., Donna L. Lybecker, and Kacee A. Garner. 2010. “The Story of Good Citizenship: Framing Public Policy in the Context of Duty‐Based versus Engaged Citizenship.” Politics & Policy 38 (1): 1‐23. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2009.00226.x/ Crowley, Kate. 2009. “Can Deliberative Democracy Be Practiced? A Subnational Policy Pathway.” Politics & Policy 37 (5): 995‐1021. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2009.00208.x/ Stephan, Mark. 2004. “Citizens as Representatives: Bridging the Democratic Theory Divides.” Politics & Policy 32 (1): 118‐135. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747‐1346.2004.tb00178.x/ Related Media Film: Citizens' Parliament. 2009. NewDemocracy. Canberra. February. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qWOoQwpJdrE Data and Discussion Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance. 2013. Australian National University. http://deliberativedemocracy.anu.edu.au/ Una objeción común en contra de la democracia deliberativa es que los ciudadanos parecen estar indispuestos a participar en la política democrática. En este artículo contribuimos a la creciente literatura que cuestiona tal impresión mediante un análisis del perfil discursivo de los ciudadanos que participan en procesos de deliberación. Entendemos por perfil discusivo, la percepción que tienen los ciudadanos de su propio papel como participantes en el proceso democr
ISSN:1555-5623
1747-1346
DOI:10.1111/polp.12015