Scapular dyskinesis following displaced fractures of the middle clavicle

Purpose To evaluate the rate of scapular dyskinesis and resulting patient outcomes after treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Methods Skeletally mature patients with isolated, displaced midshaft clavicle fractures treated with or without surgery over a 16-month period were recruited....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery 2015-12, Vol.24 (12), p.e331-e336
Hauptverfasser: Shields, Edward, MD, Behrend, Caleb, MD, Beiswenger, Tanya, MD, Strong, Benjamin, MD, English, Christopher, MD, Maloney, Michael, MD, Voloshin, Ilya, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose To evaluate the rate of scapular dyskinesis and resulting patient outcomes after treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures. Methods Skeletally mature patients with isolated, displaced midshaft clavicle fractures treated with or without surgery over a 16-month period were recruited. The minimum length of follow-up at study examination was 12 months. Patient outcomes were documented using the SICK (scapular malposition, inferomedial border prominence, coracoid pain and malposition, and dyskinesis of scapular movement) Scapula Rating Scale, the Simple Shoulder Test, 3 visual analog scales (VAS) for pain, and shoulder range-of-motion and strength measurements. Of the 32 eligible patients, 24 (75%) were successfully recruited. Results The mean participant age was 46 ± 17 years, with a mean length of follow-up at study evaluation of 1.7 ± 1 years. Surgical fixation was performed in 12 patients (50%). Scapular dyskinesis was present in 37.5% of patients (n = 9). Patients with scapular dyskinesis had worse SICK scapula scores (5.8 ± 2.2 vs 3.1 ± 2.4, P  = .01), worse Simple Shoulder Test scores (10.5 ± 1.6 vs 11.7 ± 0.8, P  = .029), higher maximum VAS pain scores (4.1 ± 3.1 vs 0.97 ± 1.2, P  = .002), and worse average VAS pain scores in the week before the examination (2.7 ± 2.5 vs 0.2 ± 0.4, P  
ISSN:1058-2746
1532-6500
DOI:10.1016/j.jse.2015.05.047