Clinical usefulness of the ablative margin assessed by magnetic resonance imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma

Background & Aims The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of ablative margin (AM) grading by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with Gd-EOB-DTPA administered prior to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and to identify factors for achieving a sufficient AM and predictors for local tumo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of hepatology 2015-12, Vol.63 (6), p.1360-1367
Hauptverfasser: Koda, Masahiko, Tokunaga, Shiho, Okamoto, Toshiaki, Hodozuka, Masanori, Miyoshi, Kennichi, Kishina, Manabu, Fujise, Yuki, Kato, Jun, Matono, Tomomitsu, Sugihara, Takaaki, Oyama, Kenji, Hosho, Keiko, Okano, Jun-ichi, Murawaki, Yoshikazu, Kakite, Suguru, Yamashita, Eijiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background & Aims The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of ablative margin (AM) grading by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with Gd-EOB-DTPA administered prior to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and to identify factors for achieving a sufficient AM and predictors for local tumor progression. Methods A total of 124 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) were treated by RFA after Gd-EOB-DTPA administration. MRI and enhanced CT were performed within seven hours and one month after RFA. The AM assessment was categorized using three grades: AM (+), low-intensity area with continuous high-intensity rim; AM zero, low-intensity area with discontinuous high-intensity rim; and AM (−), low-intensity area extends beyond the high-intensity rim. Patients were followed and local tumor progression was observed. Results AM (+), AM zero, AM (−), and indeterminate were found in 34, 33, 26, and 31 nodules, respectively. The overall agreement rate between MRI and enhanced CT for the diagnosis of AM was 56.8%. The κ coefficient was 0.326 ( p
ISSN:0168-8278
1600-0641
DOI:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.07.023