Phylogenetic relationships of African microhylid frogs inferred from DNA sequences of mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA genes
The phylogenetic relationships of microhylid frogs are poorly understood. The first molecular phylogeny for continental African microhylids is presented, including representatives of all subfamilies, six of the eight genera, and the enigmatic hemisotid Hemisus. Mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA sequenc...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Organisms diversity & evolution 2004-12, Vol.4 (4), p.227-235 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The phylogenetic relationships of microhylid frogs are poorly understood. The first molecular phylogeny for continental African microhylids is presented, including representatives of all subfamilies, six of the eight genera, and the enigmatic hemisotid
Hemisus. Mitochondrial 12S and 16S rRNA sequence data were analysed using parsimony, likelihood and Bayesian methods. Analyses of the data are consistent with the monophyly of all sampled subfamilies and genera.
Hemisus does not nest within either brevicipitines or non-brevicipitines. It is possibly the sister group to brevicipitines, in which case brevicipitines might not be microhylids.
Phrynomantis and
Hoplophryne potentially group with non-African, non-brevicipitine microhylids, in agreement with recent morphological and molecular data. Within brevicipitines,
Breviceps is recovered as the sister group to a clade of
Callulina+
Spelaeophryne+
Probreviceps. The relationships among the genera within this latter clade are unclear, being sensitive to the method of analysis. Optimal trees suggest the
Probreviceps macrodactylus subspecies complex might be paraphyletic with respect to
P. uluguruensis, corroborating preliminary morphological studies indicating that
P. m. rungwensis may be a distinct species.
P. m. loveridgei may be paraphyletic with respect to
P. m. macrodactylus, though this is not strongly supported. Some biogeographic hypotheses are examined in light of these findings. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1439-6092 1618-1077 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ode.2004.01.005 |