Comparison of effects of classic LMA, cobraPLA and V-gel rabbit on QTc interval
We aimed to compare the effects of three different supraglottic airway devices, the classic LMA, PLA, and V-gel, on hemodynamics and QTc in rabbits under general anesthesia. The rabbits were divided into four groups: Group C (n=5) control group with no airway device used, Group L (n=5, classic LMA),...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bratislava Medical Journal 2015, Vol.116 (10), p.632-636 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We aimed to compare the effects of three different supraglottic airway devices, the classic LMA, PLA, and V-gel, on hemodynamics and QTc in rabbits under general anesthesia.
The rabbits were divided into four groups: Group C (n=5) control group with no airway device used, Group L (n=5, classic LMA), Group P (n=5, CobraPLA) and Group V (n=5, V-gel-rabbit). Basal values of heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and ECG for QTc interval were measured and the measurements were evaluated at 1, 5, 15, and 30 minutes after inserting the airway device
The values of HR, MAP and QTc in Group V at minutes 1 and 5 were significantly different to those in Group L and Group P (p |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0006-9248 1336-0345 1336-0345 |
DOI: | 10.4149/BLL_2015_122 |