Hunter Observations of Moose Alces alces as a Management Tool
Pre- and post-harvest population size and the structural composition of the moose Alces alces population in the Vefsn valley in northern Norway estimated by the use of cohort analysis were compared to population density indices derived from hunter moose observations during 1968–1993. The moose obser...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Wildlife Biology 1999-06, Vol.5 (2), p.107-117 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Pre- and post-harvest population size and the structural composition of the moose Alces alces population in the Vefsn valley in northern Norway estimated by the use of cohort analysis were compared to population density indices derived from hunter moose observations during 1968–1993. The moose observation index (moose seen per hunter day) was able to predict the same trend in the post-harvest population size in 84% of the cases, and was significantly linearly related both to pre- and post-harvest population size. The moose observation index was more closely related to the post-than to the pre-harvest population size, probably because the main part of the harvest took place during the first week of the hunting season, whereas the observation index was based on aggregated values collected over two weeks. Moreover, the observation index tended to overestimate population size when hunting success was high, indicating that factors influencing hunting success may also affect the probability of detecting moose. The recruitment rate (calves per female) recorded by the hunters was also closely related to the recruitment rate estimated by the cohort analysis, suggesting that the observed recruitment rate may provide a useful index of the recruitment to the population. We suggest that further improvements of moose recordings as a management tool can be obtained if the data are analysed separately for shorter periods (e.g. week, day) of the hunting season because this will probably reduce the impact of annual variation in harvesting rates on the estimates. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0909-6396 1903-220X 1903-220X |
DOI: | 10.2981/wlb.1999.014 |