Horizontal infection prevention measures and a risk-managed approach to vancomycin-resistant enterococci: An evaluation

Background The use of infection control measures in the management of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is hotly debated. A risk-managed approach to VRE control after the introduction of 2 horizontal infection prevention measures—an environmental cleaning (EC) and an antimicrobial stewardship (...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of infection control 2015-11, Vol.43 (11), p.1238-1243
Hauptverfasser: Bryce, Elizabeth, MD, FRCPC, Grant, Jennifer, MD, CM, FRCPC, Scharf, Sydney, BA, RN, Dempster, Linda, BSN, MA, Lau, Tim T.Y., PharmD, FCSHP, Laing, Felicia, MSc, Shajari, Salomeh, BSc, Forrester, Leslie, MA, MSc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The use of infection control measures in the management of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) is hotly debated. A risk-managed approach to VRE control after the introduction of 2 horizontal infection prevention measures—an environmental cleaning (EC) and an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program—was assessed. Methods Routine screening for VRE was discontinued 6 and 4 months after introduction of the EC and AMS programs, respectively. Only 4 units (intensive care, burns-trauma, solid organ transplant, and bone marrow transplant units) where patients were deemed to be at increased risk for VRE infection continued screening and contact precautions. Cost avoidance and value-added benefits were monitored by the hospital finance department. VRE monitoring on these high-risk units and facility-wide comprehensive bacteremia surveillance continued as per established protocols. Surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) remained unchanged. Results VRE bacteremia rates did not increase with the change to the VRE risk-managed approach. The number of patients requiring VRE isolation in all areas of the hospital decreased from an average of 32 to 6 beds per day. Statistically significant reductions in CDI and MRSA rates were observed possibly related to the aggressive decluttering, equipment cleaning, and AMS program elements. Conclusion A risk-managed approach to VRE can be implemented without adverse consequences and potentially with significant benefits to a facility.
ISSN:0196-6553
1527-3296
DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2015.06.003