Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: An Analysis of Different Techniques

To compare conventional minimally invasive (MIS) approaches and newer technology approaches in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease. PubMed was searched for all pertinent randomized-controlled trials (RCTs). Selected outcomes were compared using standard meta-analysis methods. Three RCTs...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical obstetrics and gynecology 2015-12, Vol.58 (4), p.732-739
Hauptverfasser: RIDGEWAY, BERI M, BUECHEL, MEGAN, NUTTER, BENJAMIN, FALCONE, TOMMASO
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To compare conventional minimally invasive (MIS) approaches and newer technology approaches in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease. PubMed was searched for all pertinent randomized-controlled trials (RCTs). Selected outcomes were compared using standard meta-analysis methods. Three RCTs compared conventional MIS to robotic-assisted hysterectomy and 5 RCTs compared conventional laparoscopy to single-incision hysterectomy. There were no significant differences in outcomes. A subanalysis comparing conventional to robotic-assisted laparoscopy found an association between conventional laparoscopy and shorter operative time. Newer technology approaches do not confer an advantage over conventional MIS approaches in women undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease.
ISSN:0009-9201
1532-5520
DOI:10.1097/GRF.0000000000000149