The effect of different fertilizer treatments on water quality parameters in rice-cum-fish culture systems

Summary A rice–fish culture experiment was conducted to determine the effects of different fertilizer treatments on water quality parameters, i.e. dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH and conductivity, as well as the nutrients nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus. Data gathered were subjected to analysis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied ichthyology 2005-10, Vol.21 (5), p.399-405
Hauptverfasser: Yaro, I., Lamai, S. L., Oladimeji, A. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary A rice–fish culture experiment was conducted to determine the effects of different fertilizer treatments on water quality parameters, i.e. dissolved oxygen, temperature, pH and conductivity, as well as the nutrients nitrogen, potassium and phosphorus. Data gathered were subjected to analysis of variance. Dissolved oxygen, nitrogen and potassium concentrations showed significant differences (P0.05) in the oxygen concentration between rice‐only and rice‐cum‐fish management systems was probably due to the narrow spacing of rice cultivars (20 × 20 cm). Under different fertilizer treatments, dissolved oxygen, nitrogen and potassium concentrations were not significantly different (P>0.05), indicating that different fertilizer treatments had no effect on their concentrations. Mean temperature, pH, conductivity and phosphorus concentrations in all rice‐cum‐fish management systems and fertilizer treatments did not differ significantly (P>0.05) from each other. This might possibly be due to the hydrogeology and climatic conditions of the area. However, all levels of studied water quality parameters were tolerable to the fish (Oreochromis niloticus) in the rice–fish ecosystem. There was no significant difference (P>0.05) in rice yield between the rice–fish management system and the rice‐only management system. However, there was a significant difference (P0.05) under different rice–fish management systems, but was significant (P
ISSN:0175-8659
1439-0426
DOI:10.1111/j.1439-0426.2005.00654.x