Evolution of ontogeny in the hippopotamus skull: using allometry to dissect developmental change

Allometry describes the effect of size change on aspects of an organism's form and can be used to summarize the developmental history of growing parts of an animal. By comparing how allometric growth differs between species, it is possible to reveal differences in their pathways of development....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological journal of the Linnean Society 2003-12, Vol.80 (4), p.625-638
1. Verfasser: WESTON, ELEANOR M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Allometry describes the effect of size change on aspects of an organism's form and can be used to summarize the developmental history of growing parts of an animal. By comparing how allometric growth differs between species, it is possible to reveal differences in their pathways of development. The ability to compare and categorize developmental change between species is demonstrated here using morphometric methods. This involves the interspecific statistical comparison of a large number of bivariate relationships that summarize ontogenetic trajectories. These linear ontogenetic trajectories can be modified as they evolve in any of three ways: ontogenetic scaling indicative of change in the duration of growth, lateral shifts indicative of changes in prenatal development, and directional change indicative of novel modes of postnatal growth. I apply this analysis to skulls of the common hippopotamus (Hippopotamus amphibius) and the pygmy hippopotamus (Hexaprotodon liberiensis). The number of allometric changes falling into each category was statistically determined and Jolicoeur's multivariate generalization of simple allometry was used to provide an overview of cranial variation. For these skulls, directional change was not found to be statistically significant, but ontogenetic scaling and lateral shifts were both common. This indicates that conserved patterns of growth covariance (ontogenetic scaling) can be separated from novel or derived patterns (directional change and/or lateral shifts). This study demonstrates that He. liberiensis is not simply an ontogenetically scaled version of its larger relative. The evolutionary implications of allometric growth variation are discussed in the light of these findings and those of other studies. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 80, 625–638.
ISSN:0024-4066
1095-8312
DOI:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2003.00263.x