Two-stage activity-safety study of daily rifapentine during intensive phase treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis

BACKGROUND: Rifapentine (RPT) has potent activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis; however, the optimal dose for anti-tuberculosis treatment is unknown.OBJECTIVE: To determine the antimicrobial activity, safety and tolerability of RPT 450 mg or 600 mg administered daily during the first 8 weeks o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease 2015-07, Vol.19 (7), p.780-786
Hauptverfasser: Dawson, R., Narunsky, K., Carman, D., Gupte, N., Whitelaw, A., Efron, A., Barnes, G. L., Hoffman, J., Chaisson, R. E., McIlleron, H., Dorman, S. E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:BACKGROUND: Rifapentine (RPT) has potent activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis; however, the optimal dose for anti-tuberculosis treatment is unknown.OBJECTIVE: To determine the antimicrobial activity, safety and tolerability of RPT 450 mg or 600 mg administered daily during the first 8 weeks of treatment for pulmonary tuberculosis (TB).DESIGN: In a two-stage, randomised open-label study, adults with sputum smear-positive TB were randomised to receive RPT 450 mg, RPT 600 mg or rifampicin (RMP) 600 mg daily for 8 weeks with isoniazid, pyrazinamide and ethambutol. The primary endpoint was sputum culture status on Löwenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium at completion of 8 weeks of treatment.RESULTS: A total of 153 participants were enrolled. Both RPT regimens met pre-specified criteria to advance to stage 2. At completion of 8 weeks of treatment, LJ culture conversion occurred in 85% (35/41), 96% (43/45) and 94% (34/36) of participants in the RPT 450 mg, RPT 600 mg and RMP groups, respectively. The proportions of participants discontinuing treatment were similar (respectively 1/54 [2.0%], 1/51 [2.0%] and 4/48 [8.3%] in the RPT 450 mg, RPT 600 mg and RMP groups), as were grade 3 adverse events (0/54 [0%], 1/51 [2.0%] and 4/48 [8.3%]).CONCLUSIONS: There was a trend towards greater efficacy with RPT 600 mg than with RPT 450 mg. Daily RPT was safe and well-tolerated.
ISSN:1027-3719
1815-7920
DOI:10.5588/ijtld.14.0868