Effects of Population Density on Individual Growth of Brown Trout in Streams

Some studies suggest that lotic populations of brown trout (Salmo trutta) are regulated through density-dependent mortality and emigration to the extent that mean growth rates of resident survivors are unrelated to trout densities. To test this, we studied the relationship between density and growth...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ecology (Durham) 1999-04, Vol.80 (3), p.941-956
Hauptverfasser: Jenkins, Thomas M., Diehl, Sebastian, Kratz, Kim W., Cooper, Scott D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 956
container_issue 3
container_start_page 941
container_title Ecology (Durham)
container_volume 80
creator Jenkins, Thomas M.
Diehl, Sebastian
Kratz, Kim W.
Cooper, Scott D.
description Some studies suggest that lotic populations of brown trout (Salmo trutta) are regulated through density-dependent mortality and emigration to the extent that mean growth rates of resident survivors are unrelated to trout densities. To test this, we studied the relationship between density and growth, mortality, and emigration of brown trout in two alpine streams and a set of stream channels in eastern California. We sampled trout at the scale of "segments" (5-31 m long riffles, runs, and pools) and "sections" (340-500 m in length) of Convict Creek over a 3-yr period. Trout were also sampled during 6 yr in seven 90-m sections of Mammoth Creek. For 2 yr, we manipulated trout densities in Convict Creek by removing trout from two sections and adding trout to two other sections. We also manipulated densities in seven 50-m stream channels, using a natural size distribution of trout in one year and underyearlings only in a second year. In both streams, average size (body length or mass) of underyearlings in fall was negatively related to trout density and was furthermore affected by sampling location and year. The strong, negative relationship between individual mass and density of trout could be detected at the spatial scale of whole sections, but not at the scale of individual segments. The Convict Creek and stream channel experiments also revealed strong negative effects of density on average mass of underyearlings in fall, and on proportional mass increase of yearling and older trout from spring to fall. In contrast, mortality and emigration were unrelated to initial stocking densities in the channels. In all our data, the negative effects on growth were most pronounced at densities
doi_str_mv 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0941:EOPDOI]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17244920</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A54545720</galeid><jstor_id>177029</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A54545720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4671-dbdf5a1bd98897dca582de275fc610734e44be4448ad77b3c514db172bd0433a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkV1rFDEUhgdRcK39D4OKKDjbJJPZJPWqTtftwsIUrRciEjL5qFlmkzWZsey_N-OUKtKr5hBySJ68OTlvlp1AMIeUgRMAICrYoqJvIGPsLaDgG2AYni6by_Nm_R3Nwbxu3qNH2QyykhUMEvA4m93depo9i3EL0oCYzrLN0hgt-5h7k1_6_dCJ3nqXn2sXbX_IU7p2yv6yahBdvgr-pv8xoh9S5vKr4Ic-ty7_3ActdvF59sSILurj2_Uo-_JxeVVfFJtmta7PNoXECwIL1SpTCdgqRikjSoqKIqURqYxcQEBKrDFu08RUKELaUlYQqxYS1CqAy1KUR9nrSXcf_M9Bx57vbJS664TTfog8oRgzBBL44j9w64fgUm0cpWYuICIj9G6CrkWnuXXG90HIa-10EJ132ti0fVbhFOSPZnEPnkLpnZX38auJl8HHGLTh-2B3Ihw4BHx0lI_e8NEbPjrKk6N8dJRPjnLEAa8bjpLSq9vfiChFZ4Jw0sa_chRDQEfs04TdpEIOD32NL-uvI0BBmU6T6MtJdBt7H_4VRSUgqeMEIFb-BvHvxUE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>218961270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Population Density on Individual Growth of Brown Trout in Streams</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Jenkins, Thomas M. ; Diehl, Sebastian ; Kratz, Kim W. ; Cooper, Scott D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Thomas M. ; Diehl, Sebastian ; Kratz, Kim W. ; Cooper, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><description>Some studies suggest that lotic populations of brown trout (Salmo trutta) are regulated through density-dependent mortality and emigration to the extent that mean growth rates of resident survivors are unrelated to trout densities. To test this, we studied the relationship between density and growth, mortality, and emigration of brown trout in two alpine streams and a set of stream channels in eastern California. We sampled trout at the scale of "segments" (5-31 m long riffles, runs, and pools) and "sections" (340-500 m in length) of Convict Creek over a 3-yr period. Trout were also sampled during 6 yr in seven 90-m sections of Mammoth Creek. For 2 yr, we manipulated trout densities in Convict Creek by removing trout from two sections and adding trout to two other sections. We also manipulated densities in seven 50-m stream channels, using a natural size distribution of trout in one year and underyearlings only in a second year. In both streams, average size (body length or mass) of underyearlings in fall was negatively related to trout density and was furthermore affected by sampling location and year. The strong, negative relationship between individual mass and density of trout could be detected at the spatial scale of whole sections, but not at the scale of individual segments. The Convict Creek and stream channel experiments also revealed strong negative effects of density on average mass of underyearlings in fall, and on proportional mass increase of yearling and older trout from spring to fall. In contrast, mortality and emigration were unrelated to initial stocking densities in the channels. In all our data, the negative effects on growth were most pronounced at densities &lt;1 trout/m2 and the growth-density relationships were well described by negative power curves. Large individuals were always less affected by increasing trout density than were small individuals, suggesting a competitive advantage of large over small trout that increased with density. We conclude that individual growth of brown trout in streams can be affected by trout density to an extent that suggests a substantial influence on population regulation. Results from our multiyear, multiscale, and experimental study indicate that density dependence in the growth of stream salmonids will be difficult to detect in purely observational data, especially in systems with relatively high fish densities (where the growth-density relationship has a flat slope), when data are collected and analyzed at small spatial scales, and when insufficient information is collected to assess the contribution of interannual variation in growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9658</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-9170</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0941:EOPDOI]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ECGYAQ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Ecological Society of America</publisher><subject>Agnatha. Pisces ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal ecology ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Average linear density ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brown trout ; coefficient of variation of mass ; Creeks ; Creeks &amp; streams ; Demecology ; Density ; density dependence ; Ecosystems ; emigration ; Environmental aspects ; Fish ; Fish populations ; Freshwater ecology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; individual growth ; Mortality ; Physical growth ; Population density ; Population ecology ; Population growth ; population regulation ; Salmo trutta ; salmonids ; Sierra Nevada ; spatial scale ; Streams ; Trout ; Vertebrata</subject><ispartof>Ecology (Durham), 1999-04, Vol.80 (3), p.941-956</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1999 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1999 by the Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 1999 Ecological Society of America</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Apr 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4671-dbdf5a1bd98897dca582de275fc610734e44be4448ad77b3c514db172bd0433a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4671-dbdf5a1bd98897dca582de275fc610734e44be4448ad77b3c514db172bd0433a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/177029$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/177029$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1841082$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diehl, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kratz, Kim W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Population Density on Individual Growth of Brown Trout in Streams</title><title>Ecology (Durham)</title><description>Some studies suggest that lotic populations of brown trout (Salmo trutta) are regulated through density-dependent mortality and emigration to the extent that mean growth rates of resident survivors are unrelated to trout densities. To test this, we studied the relationship between density and growth, mortality, and emigration of brown trout in two alpine streams and a set of stream channels in eastern California. We sampled trout at the scale of "segments" (5-31 m long riffles, runs, and pools) and "sections" (340-500 m in length) of Convict Creek over a 3-yr period. Trout were also sampled during 6 yr in seven 90-m sections of Mammoth Creek. For 2 yr, we manipulated trout densities in Convict Creek by removing trout from two sections and adding trout to two other sections. We also manipulated densities in seven 50-m stream channels, using a natural size distribution of trout in one year and underyearlings only in a second year. In both streams, average size (body length or mass) of underyearlings in fall was negatively related to trout density and was furthermore affected by sampling location and year. The strong, negative relationship between individual mass and density of trout could be detected at the spatial scale of whole sections, but not at the scale of individual segments. The Convict Creek and stream channel experiments also revealed strong negative effects of density on average mass of underyearlings in fall, and on proportional mass increase of yearling and older trout from spring to fall. In contrast, mortality and emigration were unrelated to initial stocking densities in the channels. In all our data, the negative effects on growth were most pronounced at densities &lt;1 trout/m2 and the growth-density relationships were well described by negative power curves. Large individuals were always less affected by increasing trout density than were small individuals, suggesting a competitive advantage of large over small trout that increased with density. We conclude that individual growth of brown trout in streams can be affected by trout density to an extent that suggests a substantial influence on population regulation. Results from our multiyear, multiscale, and experimental study indicate that density dependence in the growth of stream salmonids will be difficult to detect in purely observational data, especially in systems with relatively high fish densities (where the growth-density relationship has a flat slope), when data are collected and analyzed at small spatial scales, and when insufficient information is collected to assess the contribution of interannual variation in growth.</description><subject>Agnatha. Pisces</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal ecology</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Average linear density</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brown trout</subject><subject>coefficient of variation of mass</subject><subject>Creeks</subject><subject>Creeks &amp; streams</subject><subject>Demecology</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>density dependence</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>emigration</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish populations</subject><subject>Freshwater ecology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>individual growth</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Physical growth</subject><subject>Population density</subject><subject>Population ecology</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>population regulation</subject><subject>Salmo trutta</subject><subject>salmonids</subject><subject>Sierra Nevada</subject><subject>spatial scale</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Trout</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><issn>0012-9658</issn><issn>1939-9170</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkV1rFDEUhgdRcK39D4OKKDjbJJPZJPWqTtftwsIUrRciEjL5qFlmkzWZsey_N-OUKtKr5hBySJ68OTlvlp1AMIeUgRMAICrYoqJvIGPsLaDgG2AYni6by_Nm_R3Nwbxu3qNH2QyykhUMEvA4m93depo9i3EL0oCYzrLN0hgt-5h7k1_6_dCJ3nqXn2sXbX_IU7p2yv6yahBdvgr-pv8xoh9S5vKr4Ic-ty7_3ActdvF59sSILurj2_Uo-_JxeVVfFJtmta7PNoXECwIL1SpTCdgqRikjSoqKIqURqYxcQEBKrDFu08RUKELaUlYQqxYS1CqAy1KUR9nrSXcf_M9Bx57vbJS664TTfog8oRgzBBL44j9w64fgUm0cpWYuICIj9G6CrkWnuXXG90HIa-10EJ132ti0fVbhFOSPZnEPnkLpnZX38auJl8HHGLTh-2B3Ihw4BHx0lI_e8NEbPjrKk6N8dJRPjnLEAa8bjpLSq9vfiChFZ4Jw0sa_chRDQEfs04TdpEIOD32NL-uvI0BBmU6T6MtJdBt7H_4VRSUgqeMEIFb-BvHvxUE</recordid><startdate>199904</startdate><enddate>199904</enddate><creator>Jenkins, Thomas M.</creator><creator>Diehl, Sebastian</creator><creator>Kratz, Kim W.</creator><creator>Cooper, Scott D.</creator><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199904</creationdate><title>Effects of Population Density on Individual Growth of Brown Trout in Streams</title><author>Jenkins, Thomas M. ; Diehl, Sebastian ; Kratz, Kim W. ; Cooper, Scott D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4671-dbdf5a1bd98897dca582de275fc610734e44be4448ad77b3c514db172bd0433a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Agnatha. Pisces</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal ecology</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Average linear density</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brown trout</topic><topic>coefficient of variation of mass</topic><topic>Creeks</topic><topic>Creeks &amp; streams</topic><topic>Demecology</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>density dependence</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>emigration</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish populations</topic><topic>Freshwater ecology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>individual growth</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Physical growth</topic><topic>Population density</topic><topic>Population ecology</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>population regulation</topic><topic>Salmo trutta</topic><topic>salmonids</topic><topic>Sierra Nevada</topic><topic>spatial scale</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Trout</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jenkins, Thomas M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diehl, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kratz, Kim W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cooper, Scott D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jenkins, Thomas M.</au><au>Diehl, Sebastian</au><au>Kratz, Kim W.</au><au>Cooper, Scott D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Population Density on Individual Growth of Brown Trout in Streams</atitle><jtitle>Ecology (Durham)</jtitle><date>1999-04</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>941</spage><epage>956</epage><pages>941-956</pages><issn>0012-9658</issn><eissn>1939-9170</eissn><coden>ECGYAQ</coden><abstract>Some studies suggest that lotic populations of brown trout (Salmo trutta) are regulated through density-dependent mortality and emigration to the extent that mean growth rates of resident survivors are unrelated to trout densities. To test this, we studied the relationship between density and growth, mortality, and emigration of brown trout in two alpine streams and a set of stream channels in eastern California. We sampled trout at the scale of "segments" (5-31 m long riffles, runs, and pools) and "sections" (340-500 m in length) of Convict Creek over a 3-yr period. Trout were also sampled during 6 yr in seven 90-m sections of Mammoth Creek. For 2 yr, we manipulated trout densities in Convict Creek by removing trout from two sections and adding trout to two other sections. We also manipulated densities in seven 50-m stream channels, using a natural size distribution of trout in one year and underyearlings only in a second year. In both streams, average size (body length or mass) of underyearlings in fall was negatively related to trout density and was furthermore affected by sampling location and year. The strong, negative relationship between individual mass and density of trout could be detected at the spatial scale of whole sections, but not at the scale of individual segments. The Convict Creek and stream channel experiments also revealed strong negative effects of density on average mass of underyearlings in fall, and on proportional mass increase of yearling and older trout from spring to fall. In contrast, mortality and emigration were unrelated to initial stocking densities in the channels. In all our data, the negative effects on growth were most pronounced at densities &lt;1 trout/m2 and the growth-density relationships were well described by negative power curves. Large individuals were always less affected by increasing trout density than were small individuals, suggesting a competitive advantage of large over small trout that increased with density. We conclude that individual growth of brown trout in streams can be affected by trout density to an extent that suggests a substantial influence on population regulation. Results from our multiyear, multiscale, and experimental study indicate that density dependence in the growth of stream salmonids will be difficult to detect in purely observational data, especially in systems with relatively high fish densities (where the growth-density relationship has a flat slope), when data are collected and analyzed at small spatial scales, and when insufficient information is collected to assess the contribution of interannual variation in growth.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Ecological Society of America</pub><doi>10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[0941:EOPDOI]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9658
ispartof Ecology (Durham), 1999-04, Vol.80 (3), p.941-956
issn 0012-9658
1939-9170
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17244920
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Agnatha. Pisces
Animal and plant ecology
Animal ecology
Animal populations
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Average linear density
Biological and medical sciences
Brown trout
coefficient of variation of mass
Creeks
Creeks & streams
Demecology
Density
density dependence
Ecosystems
emigration
Environmental aspects
Fish
Fish populations
Freshwater ecology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
individual growth
Mortality
Physical growth
Population density
Population ecology
Population growth
population regulation
Salmo trutta
salmonids
Sierra Nevada
spatial scale
Streams
Trout
Vertebrata
title Effects of Population Density on Individual Growth of Brown Trout in Streams
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T14%3A01%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Population%20Density%20on%20Individual%20Growth%20of%20Brown%20Trout%20in%20Streams&rft.jtitle=Ecology%20(Durham)&rft.au=Jenkins,%20Thomas%20M.&rft.date=1999-04&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=941&rft.epage=956&rft.pages=941-956&rft.issn=0012-9658&rft.eissn=1939-9170&rft.coden=ECGYAQ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080%5B0941:EOPDOI%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA54545720%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=218961270&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A54545720&rft_jstor_id=177029&rfr_iscdi=true